Philip H. Brandt

How Judge Brandt rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Brandt no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Washington
Position
bankruptcy
Status
No longer serving
Signed orders read
19

How Judge Brandt decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Claim preclusion was applied symmetrically: a prior ruling could bar both the debtor's requested relief and the landlord's defense.

“As Debtor requests, claim preclusion applies, but his victory is Pyrrhic”

Procedural preferences

Stay relief required the named movant to establish both real-party status and standing.

“As the motion was not brought in the name of the real party in interest, nor has standing to bring it been established, it will be DENIED.”

Cautions

Commercial labels did not override the legal category Congress assigned to the substance of a transaction.

“Categories have consequences in commercial law, and GMAC’s choice to market a secured sale with lease-like economic provisions does not put the transaction into the Bankruptcy Code’s lease category.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Jacobson
· 2009-03-10
Motion for relief from automatic stay (UBS AG as servicing agent) Denied

“As the motion was not brought in the name of the real party in interest, nor has standing to bring it been established, it will be DENIED.”

In re Jolan, Inc.
· 2009-04-30
Motion for approval of sale (Chapter 7 Trustee) Denied

“The trustee’s Motion is DENIED.”

In re Dunn
· 2009-01-23
Objection to chapter 13 plan confirmation (U.S. Bank) Denied

“U.S. Bank’s objection is OVERRULED”

MacGibbon v. MacGibbon (In re MacGibbon)
· 2008-02-29
Complaint to determine dischargeability of support obligation (Debtor) Denied

“Debtor’s Additional Support obligation is nondischargeable under § 523(a)(5), which renders moot the question of its discharge-ability under § 523(a)(15).”

Claim for automatic stay violation (Debtor) Denied

“Neither the State nor Ms. MaeGibbon violated the automatic stay of § 362.”

In re Hathaway
· 2009-03-24
Motion to determine status of security deposit (Marlin Hathaway) Denied

“The Debtor’s Motion is DENIED;”

Bowden v. Structured Investments Co. (In re Bowden)
· 2004-08-27
Objection to claim (Leslie Bowden) Granted

“SICO’s claim is disallowed as late-filed”

Summary judgment (Leslie Bowden) Granted

“I will grant Bowden’s motion for summary judgment, deny SICO’s cross-motion, and enter judgment that SICO has no interest in Bowden’s retirement pay or his veterans’ disability benefits.”

Cross motion for summary judgment (Structured Investments Co. LLC) Denied
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Cline (In re Cline)
· 2002-08-06
Complaint to determine nondischargeability (Sears, Roebuck & Co.) Denied

“I will enter an order granting summary judgment to the defendants and dismissing the adversary proceeding.”

Arizona v. Ott (In re Ott)
· 1998-03-10
Summary judgment (State of Arizona) Granted

“I will grant summary judgment declaring the judgment nondisehargeable.”

Motion for reconsideration (Calvin D. Ott) Denied

“I will enter an Order denying the motion.”

In re Penberthy
· 1997-08-29
Motion to compel performance under confirmed plan (ToxGon Corporation) Granted in part

“In the circumstances of this case, I conclude debtor must pay, but that his failure does not excuse the creditor’s obligation. However, the payment must be available to fund the plan, unless and until the debtor fulfills his obligations.”

Motion for reinstatement of homestead provisions (H. Larry Penberthy) Granted in part
In re Noble
· 1995-05-25
Request for approval of reaffirmation agreement (GreenTree Financial Corporation) Denied

“The reaffirmation agreements are unenforceable and must therefore be disapproved.”

Request for approval of reaffirmation agreement (General Motors Acceptance Corporation) Denied
In re Orris
· 1994-05-03
Post confirmation fee application (Orris debtor's counsel) Granted

“The fee applications are conditionally APPROVED.”

Post confirmation fee application (Ramsey debtor's counsel) Granted
Post confirmation fee application (Stratton debtor's counsel) Granted
Post confirmation fee application (Spracklin debtor's counsel) Granted
In re Steffen
· 1995-05-17
Motion to require assumption or rejection of executory contract (General Motors Acceptance Corporation) Denied

“I will deny GMAC’s Motion and its Motion for Reconsideration.”

Motion for reconsideration (General Motors Acceptance Corporation) Denied

A historical record

Judge Brandt no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.