Heather Z. Cooper

How Judge Cooper rules, drawn from 29 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Vermont
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Commissioned
March 14, 2022
Education
South Texas College of Law, J.D.
Signed orders read
29

About Judge Cooper

Heather Z. Cooper has served as a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Vermont since March 2022 and is the court’s chief bankruptcy judge. Before joining the bench, she practiced bankruptcy and restructuring law in Vermont and clerked for the court.

Judge Cooper's practices and standing orders

The court's website lists no individual practices or standing orders of Judge Cooper's own (checked October 11, 2026), so the court's local rules and general orders are the place to look (court page ↗).

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 11, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Cooper decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A governmental contempt fine was nondischargeable where it was penal, payable to the government, and not compensation for an actual pecuniary loss.

“The plain language of § 523(a)(7) excepts from discharge: a debt to the extent it is for a fine, penalty or forfeiture owed to the government, so long as it not compensation for actual pecuniary loss.”

A contractual fee request failed where the lender showed an event of default but not the separate affirmative step required to invoke the agreement’s default remedies.

“VSAC produced no evidence it affirmatively exercised its option to place Debtor’s student loans in default, which is required under the plain language of the Credit Agreements to trigger the default remedies which include attorney fees and costs.”

In Bean, Cooper applied the temporal reading of § 109(g)(2) after the debtor voluntarily dismissed a prior case following a stay-relief motion, finding him ineligible to refile for 180 days.

“The Court adopts the strict or temporal approach and concludes that § 109(g)(2) bars re-filing for 180 days whenever a debtor seeks voluntary dismissal after a motion for stay relief has been filed.”

Procedural preferences

The court enforced local consultation requirements before considering a discovery-related request to withdraw or amend admissions.

“The parties are aware of the consultation requirement in this Court prior to the filing of a discovery motion. Thus, the Motion is procedurally defective under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7037, Local Rule 9013-1(b), and Local Rule 7026-1(e).”

When resolving the September 2026 dismissal motions in the Diocese adversary case, the court took notice that related pleadings existed but declined to treat their disputed allegations as established facts.

“For purposes of the Motion to Dismiss, the Court declines to take judicial notice of the allegations contained within either, as weighing evidence is not proper at the Rule 12(b)(6) stage of pleading.”

Cautions

A debtor’s testimony received little weight when it conflicted internally and with sworn schedules, leaving the good-faith presumption unrebutted.

“Court finds the testimony confusing, internally inconsistent, and inconsistent with Debtor's Schedules filed under penalty of perjury.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Town of Pawlet v. Banyai (In re Daniel S. Banyai)
24-10242; 25-01003 · 2026-02-12
Summary judgment (Town of Pawlet) Granted in part

“For the reasons set forth above, summary judgment is GRANTED as to the non-dischargeability of the Contempt Judgment and the accrual of all post-petition interest on the Contempt Judgment. Summary judgment is DENIED as to the non-dischargeability of the Fees and Costs Judgment and the accrual of all post-petition interest on the Fees and Costs Judgment.”

In re Glenn Christopher Andersen
26-10146 · 2026-06-22
Motion to impose automatic stay (Glenn Christopher Andersen) Denied

“Accordingly, Debtor’s Motion to Impose the Automatic Stay is DENIED.”

In re Daniel S. Banyai
24-10242 · 2025-05-22
Motion to avoid lien (Daniel S. Banyai) Denied

“Accordingly, the Town’s liens cannot be avoided under § 522(f), and the Motion must be denied.”

In re Daniel S. Banyai
24-10242 · 2025-12-02
Motion for reconsideration (Daniel S. Banyai) Denied

“For the reasons set forth above, the Motion to Reconsider is denied.”

Daudelin v. Vermont Student Assistance Corp. and Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority
24-10109; 24-01005 · 2025-11-06
Fee application (Vermont Student Assistance Corporation) Denied

“Accordingly, VSAC’s Application for attorney fees and costs as a default remedy is denied.”

In re Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington, Vermont
24-10205 · 2026-07-28
Motion for derivative standing (Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors) Granted

“For the following reasons, the Court grants the Standing Motion and overrules the objection.”

In re Corydon E. Moulton
25-10179 · 2026-02-06
Motion to avoid lien (Corydon E. Moulton) Granted in part

“For the reasons set forth above, the Motion to Avoid Lien is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.”

In re Daniel T. Quinn
15-10217 · 2026-02-23
Motion to reopen (Daniel T. Quinn) Denied

“For the reasons set forth above, Debtor’s Motion to Reopen this case is DENIED.”

In re Scott Smith
24-10221 · 2026-02-27
Motion to amend dismissal (Chavonnes Badenhorst St. Clair Cooper and Scott Smith) Granted in part

“The Court GRANTS the Parties’ proposed Amendments as follows: a. Debtor’s bankruptcy case shall be dismissed with prejudice to refiling for 180 days from the date of the amended dismissal order;”

Susco v. Hooker and Town of Mount Holly
24-10204; 24-01007 · 2025-10-16
Summary judgment (Daniel A. Susco and Andrea Celli) Denied

“The Court denies summary judgment for Debtor and grants summary judgment for the Town of Mount Holly and Thomas J. Hooker on Debtor’s unjust enrichment claim.”

Summary judgment (Town of Mount Holly) Granted
In re Lorenzo P. Quesnel, Jr. and Amy L. Quesnel
22-10167 · 2025-01-08
Motion for reconsideration (Internal Revenue Service) Denied

“Therefore, the Motion is DENIED.”

In re Carol Marie Fenimore Safari
23-10101 · 2024-08-23
Motion for stay pending appeal (Carol Marie Fenimore Safari) Denied

“Debtor’s Motion to Stay is therefore denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

All six sampled matters were pending in the search metadata. The Banyai adversary supplied one express mixed summary-judgment outcome.

Draft for Judge Cooper with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Cooper, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Cooper's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace