John Paul Jr.

How Judge Paul rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Paul no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1932–1964
Appointed by
Herbert Hoover (Republican)
Commissioned
1932-01-14
Education
Virginia Military Institute, B.A. (1903); University of Virginia School of Law, LL.B. (1906)
Signed orders read
25

How Judge Paul decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In reviewing a creditor claim, Paul treated the bank's active collection proceeding as compelling evidence that it had reserved its rights against the indorser.

“I can hardly conceive of a clearer or stronger declaration of its intention to reserve all rights against Warden.”

Procedural preferences

Paul required a negligence plaintiff to identify the particular acts relied upon before the defendant answered.

“It appears that the defendant is entitled to this and the plaintiff will be directed to furnish such bill of particulars within ten days.”

Cautions

Paul rejected a long-term bankruptcy proposal that made small early payments while the secured debt continued to grow.

“It is to my mind grossly unfair to a secured creditor to compel him to accept payments aggregating only 13 per cent, of his indebtedness, strung over a period of five years”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Allen v. School Board of Charlottesville
· 1961-12-18

Paul set requirements for administering Charlottesville's pupil-assignment plan after appellate criticism of discriminatory practices.

Goins v. County School Board of Grayson County
· 1960-09-08

Paul addressed the school rights of eight named students and the timing of applications for future school years.

Rodgers v. Irvine
· 1957-11-06
Motion for substitution of party (decedent's administrator) Granted

“grant the motion for substitution of the administrator c.t.a. as plaintiff”

Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (defendants) Granted

“dismiss the action for lack of jurisdiction.”

Merck & Co. v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp.
· 1957-05-03
Motion to dismiss patent complaint (defendant) Granted

“I find that the patent in suit, as related to claims 1, 2 and 3 is invalid and that the complaint should be dismissed.”

Virginia v. Stiff
· 1956-08-24
Criminal charge after bench trial (Commonwealth of Virginia) Granted

“The defendant must therefore be found guilty, and the fine required by the Virginia statute, namely $885, is imposed upon him, together with costs.”

Peoples National Bank v. United States
· 1956-03-27
Tax refund claim after bench trial (taxpayer bank) Denied

“Judgment will, therefore, be entered in favor of the defendant.”

Cavalier Poultry Corp. v. Fawley Motor Lines, Inc.
· 1955-11-30
Motion for prejudgment interest (plaintiff) Denied

“Under the circumstances I think that interest should not be allowed on the separate overcharges.”

Myers v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n
· 1955-04-29
Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (defendant insurer) Granted

“the action must be dismissed for that reason.”

Lemon v. United States
· 1953-03-23
Tax refund claim after bench trial (taxpayers) Granted

“they are entitled to recover the respective sums which have been stipulated as resulting from such adjustment.”

Houff Transfer, Inc. v. United States
· 1952-07-15
Petition to vacate agency order (motor carrier) Denied

“The petition of the plaintiff to vacate and set aside the order of the Commission is denied and the plaintiff’s action is dismissed.”

National Fruit Product Co. v. United States
· 1952-05-26
Tax refund claim after bench trial (taxpayer) Denied

“Plaintiff’s claim will have to be dismissed and judgment will be entered in favor of' the defendant with costs.”

Collier v. United States
· 1950-05-03
Benefits claim after bench trial (plaintiff beneficiary) Granted

“The plaintiff is entitled to judgment.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The reviewed decisions predate representative electronic case-level dockets. The profile therefore makes no claim about complete caseload mix, case duration, administrative dispositions, or motion timing.

A historical record

Judge Paul no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.