James Harry Michael Jr.

How Judge Michael rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Michael no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1980–2005
Appointed by
Jimmy Carter (Democratic)
Commissioned
1980-09-30
Education
University of Virginia, B.S. (1940); University of Virginia School of Law, LL.B. (1942)
Signed orders read
25

How Judge Michael decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Michael allowed prospective class members to rescind a timely opt-out when their later communication clearly and unequivocally expressed a desire to participate.

“those wishes are clear and unequivocal, then that party should be able to rescind any prior contrary communication to the Court asking to be excluded from the class.”

Procedural preferences

Michael transferred an improperly venued case to the permissible forum that best served witness and party convenience.

“the convenience of the parties and witnesses dictates that this action should continue in the Eastern District of Virginia.”

Cautions

Michael required more than speculation before ordering disclosure of confidential informants in a criminal case.

“Because here the defendant offers nothing more than speculation as to the degrees of the confidential informants’ roles, if any, in the crimes charged against him, the court will deny the motion.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Bright v. Apfel
· 2000-11-07
Objection to report and recommendation (plaintiff claimant) Denied

“The plaintiffs objections, filed May 8, 2000, shall be, and they hereby are, OVERRULED;”

Petition for attorneys fees (plaintiff claimant) Granted

“The plaintiffs Petition for Attorney’s Fees, filed January 21, 2000, shall be, and it hereby is, GRANTED;”

Riley v. Robey
· 2000-11-28
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“The defendant’s January 21, 2000 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim shall be, and hereby is, DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The defendant’s January 21, 2000 Motion for Summary Judgment shall be, and hereby is, GRANTED as to all three counts of the plaintiffs’ complaint.”

Adkins v. Murray
· 1994-11-29
Summary judgment (respondent) Granted

“As a result, the court must grant the respondent’s motion for summary judgment and dismiss this action.”

Geris v. Piedmont Federal Corp.
· 1993-06-23
Motion to transfer venue (defendant) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation shall be adopted as modified and the action shall be transferred to the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division.”

Allen v. Apfel
· 1999-09-21
Objection to report and recommendation (Commissioner) Denied

“The defendant’s August 11, 1999 objection to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is OVERRULED.”

Bailey v. Cost Control Marketing & Sales Management of Virginia, Inc.
· 1990-09-07
Request to rejoin class (prospective class members) Granted

“this Court is of the opinion that the Auodouns have, as a matter of law, satisfactorily repudiated their withdrawal from class membership and shall be regarded as members of the plaintiffs’ class for the purposes of this litigation.”

Dowell v. Blackburn
· 1991-08-12
Motion to vacate reference (plaintiff) Denied

“For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion to vacate reference to the magistrate judge is denied.”

Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. Hooper
· 1986-12-09
Motion to enforce administrative order (Federal Home Loan Bank Board) Granted

“The motion of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board filed pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1464(d)(8)(A) to enforce its administrative cease and desist order dated July 31,1985, shall be, and it hereby is, granted.”

Hill v. Nicodemus
· 1991-02-05
Motion for partial summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“The Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Based Upon the Plaintiff’s Lack of a Cause of Action is GRANTED. Accordingly, Count I of the Plaintiff’s Complaint shall be, and it hereby is, dismissed with prejudice;”

Motion in limine (defendants) Denied

“The Defendant’s Motion in Limine regarding certain exhibits of the Plaintiff is OVERRULED.”

Motion to preclude experts (plaintiff) Denied

“The Plaintiff’s Motion to Preclude the Defendants’ use of experts is OVERRULED.”

Motion for partial summary judgment (defendants) Granted

“that the Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Based Upon the Decedent’s Wrongful Act shall be, and it hereby is, GRANTED.”

Motion for partial summary judgment (defendants) Denied

“Consequently, the Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Based Upon Immunity shall be, and it hereby is, OVERRULED.”

Quarles v. United States Trustee
· 1996-04-10
Bankruptcy appeal (appellant debtor) Denied

“For the reasons stated above, the decision of the bankruptcy court converting the appellant’s Chapter 11 case into a Chapter 7 case will be affirmed.”

WLR Foods, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
· 1994-06-01
Objection to magistrate order (Tyson Foods) Denied

“that Tyson’s May 6, 1994 objection to the April 16, 25, and 28, 1994 nondispositive orders of the Magistrate Judge shall be, and it hereby is, overruled.”

Guaranty Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Lowe (In re Lowe)
· 1990-01-18
Bankruptcy appeal (appellant lender) Denied

“For the reasons stated, the decision of the Bankruptcy court will be AFFIRMED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The fixed historical sample includes property-damage, bankruptcy-appeal, tax, contract, environmental, medical-malpractice, and product-liability matters; two matters lack a retained nature-of-suit label. It is not representative of Michael’s full tenure.

A historical record

Judge Michael no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.