Rebecca B. Connelly

How Judge Connelly rules, drawn from 23 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Virginia
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Commissioned
July 11, 2012
Signed orders read
23

About Judge Connelly

Rebecca B. Connelly has served as a United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Western District of Virginia since July 2012. She presides over matters in Harrisonburg, Charlottesville, and Lynchburg.

Judge Connelly's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Connelly, as published on the court's website (checked October 11, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Motions

Use Judge Connelly’s amended plan chart to find the confirmation hearing date from the date the plan was served.

“Amended Plan is served on this date Confirmation will be scheduled for this date at 9:30”

Conferences

Judge Connelly holds initial and nonevidentiary hearings by video unless the notice or scheduling order says otherwise.

“Unless the notice of hearing or an order scheduling hearing provides otherwise, all of Judge Connelly’s initial hearings and nonevidentiary hearings will be held by video conference.”

Conferences

Email the scheduling address to obtain the Zoom meeting ID for a video hearing.

“Parties to a matter set for video hearing must contact [email protected] to obtain the Zoom Meeting ID number.”

Conferences

Request chambers approval by email before scheduling an in-person hearing before Judge Connelly.

“Judge Connelly’s in person hearings will only be held upon approval by her chambers. To request approval of an in person hearing, you must email [email protected].”

Trial

Judge Connelly conducts evidentiary hearings in person unless otherwise ordered.

“Unless ordered otherwise, all evidentiary hearings will be conducted in person.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 11, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Connelly decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

An administrative pause in collection does not remove an otherwise valid tax liability from the debtor's total debt.

“An administrative determination that an account is not collectible does not extinguish or reduce the underlying tax obligation.”

The court applies enacted statutory text without importing restrictions that the legislature did not include.

“As such, this Court will not read into the statute language that is not present or enacted by the legislature.”

Procedural preferences

A proposed plan modification must be supported by sufficiently stable income to make the new payments feasible; an unliquidated asset alone is insufficient.

“Merely holding a nonliquid asset or a claim (a right to payment) is not enough; the debtor must be able to make the payments under the plan as modified to render the modification feasible.”

Cautions

Bad-faith dismissal requires circumstances showing real abuse rather than an unfavorable prepetition act or a filing directed at one large debt.

“Dismissal for bad faith, therefore, should be reserved for cases of real misconduct.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Piland
25-50725 · 2026-04-30
Motion for rule 2004 examination (Westlake Legal Group, PLLC) Moot / procedural

“Westlake’s sole basis for seeking an examination under Rule 2004—to determine whether the presumption of abuse arises under the means test—is mooted by the Court’s determination that section 707(b) is inapplicable to this case.”

In re Ludwig
12-51167 · 2013-02-25
Objection to claim priority (Leslie Ludwig) Granted

“Therefore, Ms. Miller’s claim is not for a domestic support obligation and, thus, is not entitled to priority status under 11 U.S.C. § 507(a)(1)(A).”

In re Minick
· 2018-05-31
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case for bad faith (Tom Roberts) Denied

“For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court denies the motion to dismiss the petition and denies relief from stay.”

Motion for relief from stay (Tom Roberts) Denied
Roadcap v. Harrisonburg Printing & Graphics, LLC (In re Roadcap)
· 2018-08-23
Motion to quash garnishment (Phillip Roadcap) Granted in part

“For these reasons, the Court denies in part and grants in part the motion to quash the garnishment.”

Dulles Electric & Supply Corp. v. Shaffer (In re Shaffer)
· 2018-02-27
Summary judgment (Dulles Electric & Supply Corporation) Granted

“For the reasons set forth below, the Court holds as a matter of law that the debts to Dulles Electric that arose after the individual guarantors filed chapter 7 were not discharged in the individual guarantors' bankruptcy cases.”

Summary judgment (Michael Gerald Shaffer and David Eugene Osbourn, Jr.) Denied
In re Stinnie
· 2016-08-04
Motion to waive prepetition credit counseling requirement (Helen Maxine Stinnie) Denied

“The debtor in this case did not take the credit counseling course during that time period. She has not articulated any reason why this requirement is inapplicable to her nor why the requirement should be waived.”

Hall v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In re Hall)
· 2016-09-30
Motion to refer remaining claims to state court (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court dissolves the temporary injunction and denies all pending motions.”

Motion for permanent injunction (Dale and Rebecca Hall) Denied
Motion for contempt sanctions (Dale and Rebecca Hall) Denied
Hanson v. Cassidy (In re Cassidy)
· 2019-01-10
Summary judgment (Pat Hanson) Granted

“The Court therefore grants Ms. Hanson's motion for summary judgment.”

Knight v. Eppard (In re Eppard)
· 2012-11-14

After review of stipulated facts, the creditor failed to prove that the debtor's handling of tax refunds caused a willful and malicious injury.

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Virginia Broadband, LLC (In re Virginia Broadband, LLC)
12-62535 · 2013-09-09
Motion to dismiss chapter 11 case (Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors) Denied

“The Committee’s motion to dismiss is denied.”

Smith v. Bowen (In re Bowen)
12-06099 · 2013-10-04

After trial, suspicious timing did not overcome evidence that the debtor transferred property to liquidate assets and pay existing obligations rather than to hinder or defraud a creditor.

In re Hite
· 2016-09-06
Objection to plan confirmation (Chapter 13 trustee) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court overrules the trustee’s objection to confirmation of the debtors’ plan, and denies the trustee’s request to compel Sean and Melinda to amend Official Form 22C-1, Schedule I, and their chapter 13 plan.”

Motion to compel amended income forms and plan (Chapter 13 trustee) Denied

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Six sampled matters carried termination dates. Andrews had a signed denial of a motion to vacate its earlier dismissal, although its case-level index did not report a termination date. Piland and Andrews supplied the two contested motion intervals; the five early streams were empty.

Draft for Judge Connelly with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Connelly, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Connelly's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace