Marilyn Bernie "Tena" Gresky Campbell

United States District Court for the District of Utah district Senior status Appointed by Bill Clinton (Democratic) 19 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Thomas v. Weber State University
1:20-cv-00054-TC-DAO
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“WSU's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 114) is GRANTED; ... Because no reasonable jury could find that Ms. Knapp and Dr. Abel were appropriate persons under Title IX, Ms. Thomas is unable to prove an essential element of her claim.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Ms. Thomas's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 145) is DENIED;”

Pomeroy v. Utah State Bar
2:21-cv-00219-TC-JCB
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Ms. Pomeroy's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 127) is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The Utah Bar's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 128) is GRANTED. ... The Utah Bar has not violated Ms. Pomeroy's free speech and association rights by engaging in activities with which she disagrees, and its refund procedures do not violate its members' free speech rights.”

Johnson v. Uintah School District
2:24-cv-00238-TC
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS ... The Plaintiffs' second claim for vicarious liability is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE ... fourth claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE ... The court denies the Defendants' motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs' ninth claim ... [and] the eleventh claim for municipal liability.”

CleanCut, LLC v. Rug Doctor, Inc.
2:08-cv-00836
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“As a result, Rug Doctor's motion for summary judgment is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“The court also DENIES CleanCut's motion for summary judgment, as the motion relies entirely on the declaration of Curt Waisath, the inventor of CleanCut's patent.”

Finlinson v. Millard County
2:16-cv-01009
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Utah County's Amended Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 190) is accordingly DENIED. Utah County's Second Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 184) is additionally DENIED as moot.”

DiTucci v. Ashby
2:19-cv-00277
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 322) is DENIED.”

Motion to lift stay (plaintiff) Granted

“The Plaintiffs' Motion to Lift Stay (ECF No. 317) is GRANTED.”

Brewer v. Davis County
1:15-cv-00040
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. (Doc. No. 217.) Claim nine based on RLUIPA is DISMISSED with prejudice, under Rule 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted.”

Orton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
2:22-cv-00414
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS ORDERED that State Farm's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 4) is GRANTED. Ms. Orton's complaint is DISMISSED, with leave to amend.”

Milestone Electric, Inc. v. inContact, Inc.
2:20-cv-00630
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Milestone has not plausibly alleged a breach of contract or a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that inContact's motion to dismiss is GRANTED.”

Plumb v. University of Utah
2:20-cv-00574
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“It is ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Mr. Plumb's 14th Amendment due process claim against Defendants Ross Whitaker in his personal capacity and John Does 1-10 survives dismissal ... Defendant University of Utah is dismissed entirely from this case.”

Nightingale College v. Bailey
2:21-cv-00099
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“For the reasons set forth above, the court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to Utah State District Court (ECF No. 7).”

Clayton v. Ford Motor Co.
2:01-cv-00595
Judgment on pleadings (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 303 days (N = 9).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 173 days (N = 3).

Judge Campbell took senior status in 2011 and continues to carry a merits docket. The sampled 2019-2022 matters include trademark, copyright, anti-spam, civil-rights, False Claims Act, Social Security, commercial, contract, and criminal cases. The signed orders also address Title IX, compulsory bar dues under the First Amendment, and school-district liability. This describes case mix rather than the frequency of any outcome.

Put Judge Campbell's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Campbell actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Campbell's own signed orders and cites them.