Robert J. Shelby

United States District Court for the District of Utah district Appointed by Barack Obama (Democratic) 10 signed orders read

How Judge Shelby decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Grants a motion to dismiss with prejudice as to claims that fail as a matter of law.

“the court grants Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with prejudice insofar as it relates to Plaintiffs' claims for F.C.'s treatment at Elements. Plaintiffs' claims stemming from F.C.'s treatment at Catalyst under ERISA and the MHPAEA remain intact. ... For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.”

Procedural preferences

Grants a motion to stay discovery pending resolution of dispositive motions to dismiss.

“Now before the court is Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery pending the court's resolution of Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. For the following reasons, the court GRANTS the Motion. ... all case management-related requirements and deadlines applicable to this matter ... remain stayed until the court resolves Defendants' Motions to Dismiss”

Cautions

On cross-motions for summary judgment, grants one party's motion and denies the other, dismissing the losing counterclaim with prejudice.

“Kendall's motion for summary judgment on the City's counterclaim is granted. The City's motion is denied. The City's counterclaim is dismissed with prejudice.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Paul C. v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.
1:24-cv-78-RJS-JCB
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the court grants Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with prejudice insofar as it relates to Plaintiffs' claims for F.C.'s treatment at Elements. Plaintiffs' claims stemming from F.C.'s treatment at Catalyst under ERISA and the MHPAEA remain intact. ... For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.”

Valentine v. Auto-Owners Insurance
2:22-cv-00815-RJS-CMR
Reconsideration (plaintiff) Granted in part

“the Valentines' Motion to Amend is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, the court affirms its finding that the damages to the Valentines' home are not covered because the Valentines and Alpine Design did not comply with two of the Policy's provisions. However, the court finds it erred in dismissing the Valentine's breach of fiduciary duty claim and reverses its grant of summary judgment on that claim.”

Kendall v. Olsen (Salt Lake City Corp.)
2:15-cv-00862-RJS
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Kendall's motion for summary judgment on the City's counterclaim is granted. The City's motion is denied. The City's counterclaim is dismissed with prejudice.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied
In re The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints Tithing Litigation (MDL 3102)
2:24-md-03102-RJS-DAO
Motions to stay (defendant) Granted

“Now before the court is Defendants' Motion to Stay Discovery pending the court's resolution of Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. For the following reasons, the court GRANTS the Motion. ... all case management-related requirements and deadlines applicable to this matter ... remain stayed until the court resolves Defendants' Motions to Dismiss”

Beesley v. Brinton / ZibalStar, L.C.
2:17-cv-00735-RJS-DAO
Attorney fees (plaintiff) Granted in part

“the court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff, as the prevailing party, is entitled to costs in the amount of $5,710.09 ... Plaintiff is also entitled to a total attorney fee award of $275,919.36, calculated by taking the total requested amount of $375,863.86 and subtracting $2,765 for time spent on the failed mediation, $2,645 for time spent on the short form discovery motion, $665 for the issues related to Ted Hansen's testimony, $83,012.50 for time spent on the Motions in Limine, and $10,857 for having completely redacted various time entries.”

Utah Political Watch, Inc. v. Musselman
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the court GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and DENIES as moot the Preliminary Injunction Motion”

Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“DENIES as moot the Preliminary Injunction Motion”

Nursa, Inc. v. Younge and Crane, Inc.
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“the court DENIES Defendants' Motion to Dismiss”

Jenkins v. Prime Insurance
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.”

CapTech Financial, LLC v. Sportech, LLC
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and may be resubmitted after the January 17, 2025 fact-discovery”

Motion rule 56d (defendant) Granted

“Having reviewed the Motion and associated briefing, the court GRANTS Defendants' Motion.”

King v. IC Group, Inc.
Motion for reconsideration (defendant) Granted

“King's lack-of-notice claim is dismissed with prejudice. As no claims survive, the Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 126 days (N = 9).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 157 days (N = 4).

Judge Shelby carries a general civil and criminal docket. The sampled matters include employee benefits and mental-health-parity claims, insurance coverage, copyright, commercial contracts, Social Security appeals, prisoner civil-rights cases, post-conviction motions, and criminal cases. The sample describes subject matter rather than the frequency of any outcome.

Put Judge Shelby's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Shelby actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Shelby's own signed orders and cites them.