Paul Kohler

How Judge Kohler rules, drawn from 26 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the District of Utah
Position
Magistrate judge
Education
Brigham Young University, B.A. English (minor in Economics) (1995); J. Reuben Clark Law School, Brigham Young University, J.D., magna cum laude (1998)
Signed orders read
26

About Judge Kohler

Paul Kohler has served as a United States magistrate judge for the District of Utah since 2019 and has served full time since 2022. He earned a bachelor’s degree and a law degree from Brigham Young University. His chambers are in St. George, Utah.

Judge Kohler's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Kohler, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Filing

Email proposed orders directly to chambers in editable word processing format as well as attaching them to the motion.

“In addition to attaching a copy of the order to the motion, a copy of all proposed orders must be directly e-mailed to chambers at the following address: [email protected]. Proposed orders e-mailed to chambers must be editable and in word processing format.”

Filing

Provide courtesy copies of dispositive motion papers and bound Social Security administrative records.

“Courtesy copies are required for dispositive motions and associated memoranda and exhibits. Copies of administrative records in Social Security Administration appeals are required and must be bound in a three-ring binder.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Kohler decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

In Diamond G Rodeos v. Gifford, Kohler recommended default judgment and dismissal of counterclaims as Rule 37 sanctions after the defendant repeatedly failed to comply with discovery orders; the district judge adopted the recommendation.

“The Report and Recommendation recommended default judgment against Gifford and the dismissal of Gifford's counterclaims. ... based on his failures to properly participate, provide relevant discovery, or comply with court orders.”

Cautions

In Desai v. Garfield School District, Kohler recommended dismissing the amended complaint with prejudice because its allegations did not state plausible claims and a prior settlement agreement barred the remaining employment claims.

“Judge Kohler correctly determined that the Amended Complaint provides only conclusory allegations without any supporting facts to state a plausible claim.”

In a vehicle-collision case, Judge Kohler denied spoliation sanctions where the movants showed neither destruction by the plaintiff nor actual prejudice, and he required more than speculative harm.

“In short, Defendants provide no evidence of any actual harm, only speculation.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Desai v. Garfield School District
4:23-cv-00103-DN-PK · 2024-09-11
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“The Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler on August 13, 2024 recommends that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be granted and the case be dismissed with prejudice. ... the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in its entirety and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.”

Canary v. Adams
4:25-cv-00077-DN-PK · 2025-10-15
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“On September 26, 2025, Magistrate Judge Paul Kohler filed a Report & Recommendation ('R & R') recommending granting the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Darin Adams and Matthew Topham, and Chad Dotson, respectively. ... With no objections, the R & R was adopted in full.”

Diamond G Rodeos, Inc. v. Gifford
4:22-cv-00089-DN-PK · 2024-10-03
Default judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“The Report and Recommendation recommended default judgment against Gifford and the dismissal of Gifford's counterclaims. ... The Report and Recommendation was adopted and default judgment was entered against Gifford based on his failures to properly participate, provide relevant discovery, or comply with court orders.”

Schwab v. Randall
4:24-cv-00076-AMA-PK · 2025-01-10
Screening dismissal (plaintiff) Granted

“Judge Kohler, seeing no response to the previous order, issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that this action should be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. ... the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 10) and DISMISSES Plaintiff's complaint and this action.”

Kotevski v. Walton
4:25-cv-00086-AMA-PK · 2025-09-17
Screening dismissal (plaintiff) Granted

“recommending this action be dismissed because Plaintiff Milan Michael Kotevski has refused to pay a filing fee, or seek and obtain leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Judge Kohler also recommends the Court impose filing restrictions ... the Court overrules Mr. Kotevski's objections and adopts the recommendation ... ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) and DISMISSES Plaintiff's action”

Vickie T. v. Commissioner of Social Security
4:25-cv-00002 · 2025-07-15
Social security appeal (claimant) Denied

“The Court affirms the administrative ruling.”

Christopher J. v. Commissioner of Social Security
4:24-cv-00107 · 2025-07-16
Social security appeal (claimant) Denied

“The Court affirms the administrative ruling.”

Woods v. Allen
4:25-cv-00065 · 2025-09-11
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Granted

“this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.”

Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Ramsdell
4:24-cv-00038 · 2025-07-16
Default judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Default judgment is therefore not appropriate at this time, and the Court declines to enter such judgment against the Ramsdell Defendants”

Harris v. Purgatory Correctional Facility
4:25-cv-00018 · 2025-07-21
Motions to strike (defendants) Denied

“the Court denies Defendants' Motion to Strike and denies without prejudice Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions.”

Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Denied
Harris v. Purgatory Correctional Facility
4:25-cv-00018 · 2025-10-24
Motion to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“both Motions are granted, which renders moot Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings.”

Judgment on the pleadings (defendants) Moot / procedural
Turner v. Cedar Mountain Service District
4:24-cv-00079 · 2025-09-24
Motion to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“As such, the Motions to Amend are denied.”

Motions to strike (plaintiff) Denied

“ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike (Docket No. 43) is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

As the resident magistrate judge in the Southern Region at St. George, Judge Kohler handles a docket dominated by consent Social Security disability appeals that he decides on the merits, often after oral argument, alongside other civil cases and referred matters. This describes caseload composition, not motion outcomes.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202500
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202300
Mar 202300
Sep 202200
Mar 202210
Sep 202100
Mar 202100
Sep 202000

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the District of Utah, not for Judge Kohler: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed1,1208.5 months
Closed with no court action3437 months
Closed before pretrial7649 months
Closed during or after pretrial3not reported
Closed during trial1059 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20251,1208.5 months
Sep 20241,1419.3 months
Sep 20231,03510.6 months
Sep 20221,09212.3 months
Sep 20211,12812.7 months
Sep 202095110.4 months
Sep 20191,0859.7 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Kohler with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Kohler, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Kohler's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace