Dale Albert Kimball

United States District Court for the District of Utah district Senior status Appointed by Bill Clinton (Democratic) 24 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Parent 1 Mother v. Park City School District
2:22-cv-00444-DAK-JCB
Involuntary dismissal (defendant) Granted

“the District's Motion is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiffs' causes of action against the District are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. ... the court concludes that dismissal with prejudice is the only appropriate sanction under Rule 37.”

Cooperstein v. University of Utah
2:22-cv-00537-DAK-DAO
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 17] is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's Count IV (Retaliation for Reporting Government Waste) and DENIED as to Plaintiff's Failure to Pay Wages claim.”

Dettle v. Richfield City
2:13-cv-00357-DAK
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED, and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Because this ruling disposes of all of the claims at issue in the case, the Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and enter judgment in favor of Defendants.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. ... the court concludes that the officers are entitled to qualified immunity on the Dettles' Section 1983 claims. ... Therefore, the entity Defendants are immune from the Dettles' state law tort claims [under the Utah Governmental Immunity Act].”

Kitches v. MSNI Benefit, LLC
2:17-cv-00628-DAK
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 9) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and close the case. ... Because all of Kitches' claims rely on the mistaken premise that the statute of limitations has passed, the court GRANTS MSNI's motion to dismiss.”

Amanda Reynolds v. Utah Highway Patrol, et al.
2:23-cv-00034 · 2024-03-05
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Thus, the court GRANTS Defendants' motions in part, and dismisses the case without prejudice. Plaintiff will have 30 days after the underlying state case is fully resolved to file an amended complaint.”

Rulon Aufdemonte v. United States Postal Service
2:10-cv-00293 · 2010-07-09
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's case is dismissed with prejudice.”

Developers Surety and Indemnity Company v. Boswell-Olsen Enterprises, Inc., et al.
2:12-cv-00367 · 2015-12-10
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Against Mark H. Olsen and Clint Boswell [Docket No. 69] is GRANTED.”

Motion for sanctions (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery Sanctions Against Shane Lamb [Docket No. 72] is DENIED; however, Plaintiff and Lamb shall conduct Lamb's deposition within 30 days of the date of this Order.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Against Shane Lamb [Docket No. 74] and Defendant Shane Lamb's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 89] are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE at this time, to be renewed after the parties conduct Lamb's deposition.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied
Royal Schnauzers, LLC v. Dukes Royal Schnauzers, Zak McBride, and Marlayna McBride
1:20-cv-00170 · 2021-05-26
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the court DENIES Defendants' request to reopen this matter. The case, therefore, remains closed and dismissed without prejudice.”

Bobbie Joe Sharp, Jr. v. Robert Powell
2:22-cv-00378 · 2023-08-28
Habeas petition Denied

“It is therefore ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Petition for habeas corpus is DENIED and the action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

United States of America v. Luis A. Rodriguez-Lara
2:08-cr-00860 · 2010-02-23
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress is DENIED.”

Timothy Redmond, et al. v. Alfred Bigelow, et al.
2:13-cv-00393 · 2014-06-17
Class certification (plaintiff) Granted

“Based on the above reasoning, Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification is GRANTED. The court certifies two subclasses--a Damages Class and an Injunctive Class, as defined above.”

RMDI, LLC v. Remington Arms Co., Inc., Bushmaster Firearms Int'l, LLC, Rock River Arms, and Magpul Industries Corp.
2:10-cv-00029 · 2010-09-07
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction is DENIED. Plaintiff has not clearly and unequivocally demonstrated that it is likely to succeed on the merits of its claims or that there is irreparable harm.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 312 days (N = 9).

Median motion-to-ruling time: 171 days (N = 1).

Judge Kimball took senior status in 2009 and continues to hear cases. The sampled 2018-2022 docket includes Social Security disability appeals, habeas petitions, prisoner civil-rights cases, insurance coverage, immigration mandamus, criminal matters, and occasional commercial, contract, and civil-rights merits disputes. This describes the sampled case mix rather than the frequency of any outcome.

Put Judge Kimball's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Kimball actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Kimball's own signed orders and cites them.