Jeffrey C. Manske

“the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and that Plaintiffs' claims be DISMISSED.”

“the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Manske. (ECF No. 13) is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 11) is GRANTED.”

“the Motion is GRANTED as to Defendant's Motion regarding Plaintiffs' claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983 based on Kingsley... IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint is DENIED regarding Rule 8, as well as the County's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Monell claims.”

“the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Manske, ECF No. 27, is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's objections are OVERRULED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) is DENIED.”

“summary judgment for plaintiffs' state law tort claims and state law ultra vires claims be GRANTED, and those claims be DISMISSED. IT IS THEREFORE FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment as it applies to Section 1983, Section 1985, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and punitive damages, is DENIED.”

“That Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record or Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22) be GRANTED;”

“That Plaintiffs' Motion for Judgment on the Record (ECF No. 41) be DENIED.”

“The report recommends that this case be DISMISSED and that Plaintiff's Motion to Perfect Service (ECF No. 3) be DENIED.”

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey C. Manske (ECF No. 8) is ADOPTED. This case is DISMISSED and Plaintiff's Motion to Perfect Service (ECF No. 3) is DENIED.”

“IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiff's claim be dismissed as frivolous in accordance with the Report and Recommendation.”

“Defendant McLennan County's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 58) ... are GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. For clarity, the remaining claims are: ... (2) Goff's Section 1983 conditions-of-confinement claim against McLennan County; and (3) Goff's Section 1983 episodic act claim against McLennan County for its failure to protect Goff from a suicide attempt.”

“Defendants CorrHealth, LLC, Danita Loftis, Melissa Jarrett, and Deborah Sant'anna's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 59) are GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. For clarity, the remaining claims are: (1) Goff's medical negligence claims, under Chapter 74 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, against Defendants CorrHealth LLC, Loftis, Sant'anna and Jarrett...”

“IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendant City of Killeen's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 10, is GRANTED-IN-PART in accordance with the Report and Recommendation.”

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Edward Urena, Franklin Antonio Melendez, and Joshua Plowick's Motions to Dismiss, ECF Nos. 12, 14, and 16, are DENIED in accordance with the Report and Recommendation.”

“Defendant Dustin Delgado's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 48) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: Defendant Dustin Delgado's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED with regards to Plaintiff's malicious prosecution claim and DENIED with regards to Plaintiff's false arrest claim and Defendant Dustin Delgado's independent intermediary doctrine defense.”

“ORDER ADOPTING 54 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Granting in part/denying in part 44 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. Only Plaintiffs claims for harassment will remain.”