Anne T. Berton

United States District Court for the Western District of Texas magistrate 32 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Davis v. Supreme Labor Source, LLC
3:23-cv-00046 · 2023-10-10
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court RECOMMENDS that Defendant Wyoming National Logistics's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 12) should be DENIED.”

Davis v. Supreme Labor Source, LLC
3:23-cv-00046 · 2023-10-10
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“the Court RECOMMENDS that Defendant Supreme Labor Source, LLC's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 17) be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, the motion should be GRANTED as to Plaintiff Ana Davis's claims for sex/gender discrimination and hostile work environment sexual harassment but be DENIED as to her claims for race discrimination and retaliation.”

Vaughn v. Anaya
3:19-cv-00340 · 2021-10-08
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court RECOMMENDS that Defendant Anaya's Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED.”

Renteria Avila v. El Paso County Sheriff Department
3:24-cv-00128 · 2024-09-18
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED.”

Hernandez v. Kijakazi (Commissioner of Social Security)
3:22-cv-00306 · 2023-08-04
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“On August 4, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), ECF No. 15, which recommended that the Court affirm the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") denying Plaintiff's application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits. ... Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R, ECF No. 15, in its entirety, and ORDERS that the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.”

Hernandez v. Astrue
3:10-cv-00284 · 2013-03-11
Social security appeal (plaintiff (claimant)) Denied

“After considering the briefs, the record evidence of the administrative proceedings, and the written decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”), the Court AFFIRMS the final decision of the Commissioner.”

Estrada v. Astrue
3:12-cv-00049 · 2015-01-23
Social security appeal (plaintiff (claimant)) Denied

“Based on the foregoing, the Court concludes that the ALJ's opinion was supported by substantial evidence, and the decision of the Commissioner should be AFFIRMED.”

Fernandez v. Astrue
3:12-cv-00126 · 2013-04-19
Social security appeal (plaintiff (claimant)) Granted

“The Court concludes that the ALJ's decision is not supported by substantial evidence and does not comport with relevant legal standards. Based on the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for further consideration and administrative proceedings.”

Diaz v. Astrue
3:12-cv-00159 · 2013-08-30
Social security appeal (plaintiff (claimant)) Granted

“The decision of the Commissioner is, therefore, REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.”

Sanchez Santa Cruz v. Astrue
3:12-cv-00179 · 2013-07-01
Social security appeal (plaintiff (claimant)) Granted

“The decision of the Commissioner is, therefore, REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.”

Delgadillo v. Astrue
3:12-cv-00264 · 2013-09-17
Social security appeal (plaintiff (claimant)) Denied

“The Court concludes that the ALJ’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. Based on the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.”

Jacquez v. Astrue
3:12-cv-00370 · 2013-10-02
Social security appeal (plaintiff (claimant)) Denied

“For the reasons set above, the Court concludes that the ALJ properly evaluated Plaintiff’s allegation of depression, and that the ALJ’s RFC determination is supported by substantial evidence. Based on the foregoing, it is hereby ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median motion-to-ruling time: 62 days (N = 3).

Judge Berton's directly assigned docket is dominated by El Paso border prosecutions involving illegal entry or reentry, many of which were still pending during the period reviewed and did not provide civil timing or duration evidence. Her dispositive civil work generally comes through referrals that remain under the district judge's case assignment. She also runs the El Paso Sendero Re-entry Court.

Put Judge Berton's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Berton actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Berton's own signed orders and cites them.