Christopher G. Bradley

How Judge Bradley rules, drawn from 19 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas
Position
bankruptcy
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Commissioned
2023-10-01
Education
Princeton University, bachelor's degree, summa cum laude; New York University School of Law, J.D., magna cum laude; University of Oxford, doctorate in Medieval English literature
Signed orders read
19

How Judge Bradley decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A failed project and cost overruns do not by themselves establish fraudulent intent when the record also shows mechanical complications, parts constraints, outsourced-work delays, and payment or communication delays by the customer.

“But this incompletion was due to multiple factors, including unforeseeable mechanical issues with the car, availability of parts, timing of outsourced labor, and Mr. Eppright’s delays. Not false pretenses, false representations, or actual fraud.”

Exercising contractual foreclosure rights supplied a justification defense to tortious interference where the lender owed no duty to release its lien on different terms.

“Because the lender’s allegedly tortious actions were taken in the course of exercising its contractual rights, it has established the defense of justification.”

Procedural preferences

A Rule 56(d) request required a reasonable possibility that additional discovery would produce material evidence affecting summary judgment.

“The Court does not believe that there is any reasonable possibility of material evidence sufficient to affect this summary judgment coming to light.”

Cautions

Collateral material that does not illuminate the disputed transaction may distract from the proof needed for a dischargeability claim.

“The Court found this completely unconvincing, and the introduction of these videos a distraction from the matters really at issue in this trial.”

An administrative expense required a postpetition cost caused by the debtor in possession that actually benefited the estate.

“an ‘actual and necessary cost’ must arise ‘post-petition and as a result of actions taken by the [debtor in possession] that benefitted the estate.’”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Eppright v. Hill
24-10492; 24-01044 · 2026-08-06
Objection to discharge (Matthew Eppright) Denied

“Court rules against the creditor and determines that the debtor is entitled to his discharge both generally and on this particular claim.”

Claim to except debt from discharge (Matthew Eppright) Denied

“All claims against Mr. Hill will be denied.”

639 Lanark, LLC v. Alamo Lanark, LLC
23-01011 · 2024-01-03
Rule 56 d motion for additional discovery (639 Lanark, LLC) Denied

“Would-Be Buyer’s Rule 56(d) Motion is denied;”

Motion for summary judgment on tortious interference claim (Alamo Lanark, LLC) Granted

“the Lender’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted”

Greenup v. Adamson
23-03011 · 2024-10-29
Complaint to determine nondischargeability (Perry Greenup and Mary Greenup) Denied

“Plaintiffs’ claim is not excepted from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a).”

In re Damon Capital, Ltd.
23-10063 · 2024-01-11
Secured lender fee application under 506 b (Damon Capital, Ltd.) Granted in part

“The Lender’s Fee Application pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §506(b) and Rule 2016 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure is GRANTED in part”

In re Steepologie, LLC
23-10671 · 2024-01-10
Motion to compel payment of postpetition rent (Alderwood Mall LLC) Denied

“the Motion to Compel Payment of Post-Petition Rent (Dkt. No. 32) filed by Alderwood Mall LLC is DENIED.”

In re Carolina Gaytan
23-30602 · 2023-12-15
Application to employ special counsel and grant security interest (Carolina Gaytan) Granted in part

“the Application should be granted on a limited basis.”

In re ArtiusID, Inc.
23-11007 · 2024-07-23
Motion to dismiss involuntary petition (ArtiusID, Inc.) Denied

“The Court will issue an order denying the Motion to Dismiss and will enter the order for relief.”

Involuntary bankruptcy petition (Petitioning creditors) Granted
Panache Development & Construction, Inc. v. Romspen Mortgage, LP (In re RIC (Austin), LLC)
24-10264; 24-01061 · 2026-05-21
Chapter 11 plan confirmation (RIC (Austin), LLC) Granted

“the Plan must be confirmed”

Claim for equitable subordination (Panache parties) Denied

“the equitable subordination and recharacterization efforts must fail”

Claim for debt recharacterization (Panache parties) Denied
Objection to romspen proofs of claim (Panache parties) Denied

“the claim objection must fail”

In re Ryan Andrew Taylor and Bridget Ann Taylor
24-10298 · 2025-03-31
Trustee motion to compel turnover of stock options (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted in part

“The Motion to Compel [ECF No. 24] is DENIED as to the Contested Options. The Motion to Compel is GRANTED as to the balance of the third-tranche options.”

Race the Cresting Curl, LLC v. Papermaster
25-01067 · 2026-05-08
Motion for summary judgment on 523 a 19 nondischargeability (Race the Cresting Curl, LLC and Leap Forward Gaming, Inc.) Granted

“IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 15] is granted.”

NextGear Capital, Inc. v. Garcia
25-03017 · 2026-04-01
Motion to dismiss nondischargeability complaint (Defendants) Denied

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.”

Kruger Packaging, LP v. Perullo
25-03018 · 2026-03-30
Motion to dismiss objection to discharge (John Richard Perullo) Denied

“Defendant John Richard Perullo’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Objecting to Entry of Discharge Under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a) Pursuant to Rule 7012(b) is, in all respects, DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Four sampled matters were terminated and one remained pending. One business reorganization supplied an express final cash-collateral outcome.

Draft for Judge Bradley with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Bradley, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Bradley's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace