Marvin Isgur

How Judge Isgur rules, drawn from 23 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas
Position
bankruptcy
Commissioned
2004-02-01
Education
University of Houston, bachelor's degree, 1974; Stanford University, M.B.A., with honors, 1978; University of Houston Law Center, J.D., with high honors, 1990
Signed orders read
23

How Judge Isgur decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A negotiated limitation of consequential damages carried weight where experienced commercial parties had allocated risk by contract.

“An exclusion of consequential damages set forth in advance in a commercial agreement between experienced business parties represents a bargained-for allocation of risk that is conscionable as a matter of law.”

Procedural preferences

A request to postpone summary judgment for discovery should identify the evidence sought and explain how it could affect the ruling.

“The nonmovant may not simply rely on vague assertions that discovery will produce needed, but unspecified, facts.”

Cautions

A reconsideration motion that merely raises arguments available before judgment does not satisfy the narrow standard for altering a ruling.

“On a motion to reconsider, the Court need not consider arguments that could have been, but were not, made.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Harry Landry Jr.
4:25-bk-35208 · 2025-12-17
Motion for reconsideration (Harry Landry Jr.) Denied

“Mr. Landry’s motion to reconsider, ECF No. 89, is denied.”

Tavakoli v. Epstein et al.
4:22-ap-03340 · 2024-08-23
Summary judgment (Nader Tavakoli) Denied

“Summary judgment is denied for Tavakoli.”

Summary judgment (Tara Twomey and Kevin M. Epstein) Granted

“Summary judgment is granted in favor of Defendants Twomey and Epstein.”

Wesco Aircraft Holdings Inc. v. SSD Investments Ltd.
4:23-ap-03091 · 2024-06-05
Motion to compel privileged documents (2024/2026 Noteholders) Denied

“The 2024/2026 Noteholders’ Emergency Motion to Compel Production of Documents Withheld as Privileged (ECF No. 1293) is denied.”

Fieldwood Energy III LLC v. Star Measurement Sales and Service Inc.
4:22-ap-03251 · 2023-05-16
Motions to dismiss (Star Measurement Sales and Service Inc.) Denied

“The motion to dismiss at ECF No. 17 is denied.”

Entrust Energy Inc. v. Shell Energy North America (US) L.P.
4:21-ap-03930 · 2023-06-06
Motions to dismiss (Shell Energy North America (US) L.P. and other defendants) Granted

“Counts II-VII are dismissed. The plaintiff is granted leave to replead Counts III-VII to contain well-plead allegations supporting Entrust’s claims for relief.”

In re Mining Project Wind Down Holdings Inc.
4:22-bk-90273 · 2023-12-11
Motion in limine (Plan Administrator) Granted

“Bobs Limited is precluded from introducing any evidence of consequential damages, including but not limited to lost profits, at the final hearing on Debtors’ Objection to Claim No. 14 of Bobs Limited (ECF No. 850).”

Baumgartner v. Platinum Oilfield Services LLC
4:22-ap-03149 · 2023-02-06
Summary judgment (John D. Baumgartner as unsecured claim pool sub-trustee) Granted

“Summary judgment should be granted.”

In re Lilis Energy Inc.
4:20-bk-33274 · 2022-04-07
Request for relief from confirmation order (Tilden Capital Minerals LLC) Denied

“Tilden Capital Minerals, LLC’s request for relief from the Confirmation Order is denied”

In re Alta Mesa Resources Inc.
4:19-bk-35133 · 2021-04-27
Summary judgment (Tribolet Advisors LLC) Granted

“ORDER GRANTING TRIBOLET ADVISORS, LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT”

Summary judgment (Triumph Energy Partners LLC) Denied

“DENYING TRIUMPH ENERGY PARTNERS, LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT”

Katchadurian v. NGP Energy Capital Management LLC
4:18-ap-03079 · 2020-04-20
Motions to dismiss (NGP Energy Capital Management LLC and other defendants) Granted in part

“1. The claims arising under section 24.006(b) of the Texas Business and Commerce Code asserted by James Katchadurian, in his role as Litigation Trustee of Northstar’s Litigation Trust, are dismissed. 2. The Trustee’s claims against the NGP Directors, the Northstar Directors, and NGP- NOG for breach of the duty of care are dismissed. 3. The Trustee may amend his Complaint. 4. All other relief sought in NGP Energy Capital Management, LLC, et al.’s motion to dismiss the Complaint is denied.”

In re iHeartMedia Inc.
4:18-bk-31274 · 2019-04-12
Request to amend proof of claim (Samantha Springs) Granted

“Samantha Springs may amend the debtor named in Proof of Claim No. 88-2.”

Schmidt v. Meridian Capital Foundation
4:19-ap-03330 · 2019-08-16
Motions to dismiss (Meridian Capital Foundation) Granted in part

“1. Any allegations that Meridian Capital Foundation committed fraud are dismissed. 2. The balance of Meridian Capital Foundation’s motion to dismiss is denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Ten terminated matters had no retained entries, while five newer matters were still pending. Two routine request/order pairs were identifiable in one pending Chapter 13 docket, so no duration or merits-rate estimate is reported.

Draft for Judge Isgur with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Isgur, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Isgur's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace