Eduardo V. Rodriguez

How Judge Rodriguez rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas
Position
bankruptcy
Commissioned
2015-07-31
Education
Texas Southmost College, A.A., 1979; Pan American University, B.A. in psychology, 1981; Pan American University, M.B.A., 1984; Texas Tech University, J.D., 1995
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Rodriguez decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A conversion request succeeded where the full record showed good faith despite imperfect disclosures and a prepetition family transfer.

“Despite Trustee’s concerns, the evidence before this Court demonstrates that—although they were not perfect—Debtors acted in good faith in filing bankruptcy and seeking to convert.”

Protection of prospective-client confidences outweighed the value of keeping committee counsel in place when the information could be used adversely.

“The social interests of disqualification far outweigh the social interests of Okin Adams’ continued participation in this case.”

Procedural preferences

The reviewed professional-fee proceeding emphasized strict compliance with the court's role in controlling disclosure by former judicial employees.

“Further actions that undermine and circumvent this Court’s authority as determining officer will not be tolerated”

Summary judgment was withheld when record-specific communications, mechanical failure, and repair evidence left material facts unresolved.

“Plaintiff has not met its burden of demonstrating that no genuine dispute of material fact exists.”

Cautions

A subchapter V trustee could not pursue estate causes of action without statutory standing where the debtor remained in possession.

“the debtor in possession has exclusive standing to pursue estate causes of action pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1184.”

Even permissible retirement contributions did not save confirmation when means-test calculations and claim treatment were incorrect.

“this Court cannot confirm Debtors’ Plan due to the miscalculations contained in the Means Test”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Jose Arturo Villarreal Jr. et al.
1:16-bk-10253 · 2017-02-08
Chapter 13 plan confirmation (Jose Arturo Villarreal Jr. and Miriam H. Villarreal) Granted

“Accordingly, the Debtors’ chapter 13 plan, [ECF No. 2], is hereby CONFIRMED.”

Motion to dismiss or convert bankruptcy case (Chapter 13 Trustee) Denied

“Additionally, the Trustee’s Motion to Dismiss or Convert, [ECF No. 23], is hereby DENIED.”

In re Carlos Hurtado et al.
1:17-bk-10074 · 2017-11-06
Motion to convert to chapter 13 (Carlos and Consuelo Hurtado) Granted

“Therefore, Debtors’ Motion to Convert, ECF No. 24, is hereby GRANTED.”

Herring & Panzer LLP et al. v. Rosales
1:20-ap-01003 · 2020-07-09
Motions to dismiss (Omar Weaver Rosales) Denied

“Omar Weaver Rosales’ Motion to Dismiss3 is DENIED.”

In re Israel Rodriguez Jr.
1:25-bk-10230 · 2026-05-15
Objection to chapter 13 plan confirmation (Santander Bank N.A.) Denied

“For the reasons stated herein, Santander Bank, N.A., as servicer for Santander Consumer USA, Inc.’s objection to confirmation is overruled”

Chapter 13 plan confirmation (Israel Rodriguez Jr.) Granted

“Israel Rodriguez, Jr.’s ‘Amended Chapter 13 Plan’82 filed on May 13, 2026, is confirmed.”

In re Stephen Harry Dernick et al.
4:18-bk-32417 · 2020-05-22
Request for rule 9011 sanctions (Court-initiated show cause review) Denied

“the Court declines to impose Rule 9011 sanctions upon Mr. Baker.”

Lee v. Choudhri
4:20-ap-03395 · 2023-02-17
Motions to remand (Mohammad Ali Choudhri) Granted

“Accordingly, this case is remanded back to the 152nd Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas.”

In re Two Wheels Properties LLC
4:20-bk-35372 · 2020-12-30

A corporation whose Texas charter was forfeited could wind up but could not use subchapter V to continue operating, so the case was dismissed.

In re Lora Loretta Doyen
4:23-bk-35188 · 2024-06-25
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (United States of America on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service) Denied

“Accordingly, the Motion is denied without prejudice subject to Debtor meeting the conditions and requirements as delineated in this Court’s accompanying Order.”

In re Professional Fee Matters Concerning the Jackson Walker Law Firm
4:23-mp-00645 · 2024-08-16
Request for contempt sanctions (Court-initiated show cause review) Denied

“the Court finds that no party is in contempt”

Request for inherent authority sanctions (Court-initiated review as to Jackson Walker LLP and counsel) Denied

“the Court narrowly finds that Jackson Walker, Mr. Boland, Mr. Hardin, and Mr. Finestone, have not acted in bad faith and will not be sanctioned pursuant to this Court’s inherent authority”

Request for inherent authority sanctions (Court-initiated review as to David R. Jones) Granted

“as a sanction for bad faith pursuant to this Court’s inherent authority, no later than September 16, 2024, David R. Jones must complete seven and one half (7.5) hours of ethics related continuing legal education approved by the State Bar of Texas”

Singh v. Price
4:24-ap-03114 · 2024-05-31
Request for tro and preliminary injunction (Brendon D. Singh as subchapter V trustee) Denied

“the subchapter V trustee’s complaint against Lyndell Leroy Price for a temporary restraining order and injunctive relief on behalf of The Turkey Leg Hut & Company LLC, the Debtor herein is denied.”

In re MMA Law Firm PLLC
4:24-bk-31596 · 2024-06-05
Motion to disqualify counsel (MMA Law Firm PLLC) Granted

“Accordingly, Debtor's Motion to Disqualify is granted.”

Application to employ committee counsel (Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors) Denied

“the pending application to employ Okin Adams Bartlett Curry, LLP50 is summarily denied.”

In re Brendan Gowing Inc. et al.
4:24-bk-32631 · 2024-07-26
Motion to declare stay inapplicable or lift stay (Priority Services Inc.) Granted

“Accordingly, the Court finds that all elements of § 362(n)(1)(B) are satisfied, that no exception applies, and that the automatic stay never came into effect in the instant subchapter V Case as to any of the Debtors.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

All ten sampled matters were terminated. Because the fixed sample targets the oldest matters and supplied no quoted paired outcomes, no duration or motion-tendency estimate is reported.

Draft for Judge Rodriguez with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Rodriguez, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Rodriguez's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace