Terry R. Means

“For the foregoing reasons, the City's summary-judgment motion is PARTIALLY GRANTED AND PARTIALLY DENIED. The City's motion is GRANTED in that Cummings's claim that the City unlawfully discriminated against him on the basis of him having a record of disability is dismissed because he failed to properly plead that basis in his complaint. In all other aspects, the City's motion is DENIED.”

“Defendants' motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' First Amendment claims are dismissed with prejudice. Hardy's common-law retaliatory discharge claim against Parker County and Lippincott in his official capacity are dismissed with prejudice. Hardy's common-law retaliatory discharge claim against Lippincott in his individual capacity is dismissed without prejudice.”

“Ryals failed, in responding to AA's motion for summary judgment, to specify evidence in the record and to articulate how that evidence supported her claims. For this reason, summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of AA as set out above.”

“Pending before the Court are Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (docs. 27 & 28), filed September 20, 2010 ... The Court GRANTS the motions for summary judgment, OVERRULES Defendants' objections, and PARTIALLY SUSTAINS Plaintiff's objections.”

“Defendants' motion to dismiss or for summary judgment is GRANTED, and Blanks's cross motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Blanks's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to their refiling.”

“Blanks's cross motion for summary judgment is DENIED.”

“Accordingly, Metrocare's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. All claims in the above-styled and -numbered cause against Metrocare are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Likewise, Ladd's state-law claims against Cheatham and Edwards are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

“The respondent’s motion to dismiss [docket no. 14] is GRANTED.”

“Based on the foregoing, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED.”

“Accordingly, Moody’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED.”

“Highmark’s motion (doc. #400) for summary judgment is PAR- TIALLY GRANTED AND PARTIALLY DENIED.”

“Allcare’s motion (doc. #397) for summary judgment on the enforceability of the ’105 patent is DENIED.”

“Highmark’s motion (doc. #406) to exclude the testimony of Dr. Stephen D. Holland is DENIED.”

“Highmark’s motion (doc. #399) to exclude the expert opinion and report of Robert A. Sherwin is RENDERED MOOT.”

“Therefore, Alan Byrd, M.D.’s May 7, 2010, motion for summary judgment (doc. 61) is GRANTED.”

“Plaintiffs’ motion to remand is GRANTED, West Coast’s motion to sever is DENIED, and the Court lacks jurisdiction to rule on the motion to amend.”

“Thus, the motion to sever is DENIED.”

“the Court lacks jurisdiction to rule on the motion to amend.”