Rebecca Rutherford

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas magistrate 14 signed orders read

How Judge Rutherford decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Where a valid arbitration agreement governs she recommends granting a motion to compel arbitration and staying further proceedings.

“Judge Rutherford recommended the District Judge ... grant the motion to compel arbitration and stay further proceedings in the case. ... the District Judge should OVERRULE Williams's objections.”

Procedural preferences

As a magistrate judge she resolves dispositive motions by report and recommendation, recommending that the district judge grant a well-supported motion to dismiss.

“It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that State Farm's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 52) is GRANTED and Defendant Scarlett Robbins's counterclaims against State Farm are DISMISSED.”

Cautions

She recommends denying a pro se plaintiff's motions for default judgment and to remand where the procedural prerequisites are not met.

“it is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff Christopher M. Hunt Sr.'s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 7) and Motion to Remand (ECF No. 8) are DENIED.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

State Farm Life Insurance Co. v. Wisocki
3:23-cv-00597-K-BT · 2025-03-11
Motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Granted

“It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that State Farm's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 52) is GRANTED and Defendant Scarlett Robbins's counterclaims against State Farm are DISMISSED.”

Oyekwe v. Federal Express Corp.
3:21-cv-01075-L-BT · 2022-05-20
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the court grants Federal Express Corporation's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 50); dismisses with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 37(b) and 41(b), this action and Plaintiff's remaining claims ... as a result of his willful failure to participate in discovery and comply with court orders”

Default judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“denies Plaintiff's Motions for Default Judgment and Civil Contempt (Docs. 53, 57, 61)”

Ford v. Fitness International, LLC (LA Fitness)
3:17-cv-01460-L-BT · 2018-09-13
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the court grants Defendant Fitness International, LLC's Motion for No-Evidence Summary Judgment (Doc. 24) and, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a), dismisses with prejudice Plaintiff's section 1981, FDCPA, TCPA, TRISA, and DTPA claims”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“recommending that the court grant in part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 20) ... Instead of granting in part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, as proposed by the magistrate judge, the court denies as moot the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 20)”

Hunt v. Mr. Cooper Group Inc.
3:24-cv-01555-E-BT · 2025-01-21
Default judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“it is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff Christopher M. Hunt Sr.'s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 7) and Motion to Remand (ECF No. 8) are DENIED.”

Motions to remand (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff Christopher M. Hunt Sr.'s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 7) and Motion to Remand (ECF No. 8) are DENIED.”

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Moral Transportation, LLC
3:20-cv-03151-K-BT · 2021-06-23
Default judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's ‘Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against Defendants’ (ECF No. 18) is DENIED without prejudice, and Defendant Tekle has 30 days from this Order's date to file his answer ...”

Brown v. Talley Logistics, Inc.
3:24-cv-00144-L-BT · 2024-11-26
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the court grants Defendant Talley Logistics Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9); ... dismisses without prejudice Plaintiff's claims; and grants Plaintiff leave to amend her pleadings”

Williams v. Amazon.com Services, LLC
3:24-cv-00340-N-BT · 2024-12-13
Motion to compel arbitration (defendant) Granted

“Judge Rutherford recommended the District Judge ... grant the motion to compel arbitration and stay further proceedings in the case. ... the District Judge should OVERRULE Williams's objections.”

Kordia v. Noem
3:25-cv-01072-L-BT · 2025-06-27
Preliminary injunction (petitioner) Granted

“The District Judge should GRANT Petitioner’s motion (ECF No. 13) and ... ORDER her immediate release from immigration detention pending a final judgment on her underlying habeas claims.”

Reedy v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
3:25-cv-01810-L-BT · 2025-12-10
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“GRANT Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 12(b)(6) (ECF No.4) and dismiss Reedy’s claims with prejudice.”

Brightman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
3:24-cv-02886-L-BT · 2026-01-21
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“The District Judge should GRANT Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company’s Rule 12(b) Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 21) and DISMISS without prejudice Plaintiff Danielle Brightman’s complaint.”

Ngo v. Noem
3:25-cv-01943-L-BT · 2026-02-25
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“the District Judge should deny Petitioner’s habeas application and dismiss this action.”

Pate v. United States
3:25-cv-01297-K-BT · 2026-02-06
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“The petition should therefore be summarily DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for want of jurisdiction, leaving Petitioner to pursue whatever relief remains available in the Eastern District of Texas under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Caseload is illustrative from the referral dockets read, not a complete enumeration. On a referral docket the case belongs to the district judge; the magistrate manages pretrial matters and issues recommendations the district judge then adopts or modifies.

Put Judge Rutherford's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Rutherford actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Rutherford's own signed orders and cites them.