Patrick Errol Higginbotham

How Judge Higginbotham rules, drawn from 17 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Higginbotham left this court for the U.S. Supreme Court. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Position
District judge
Status
Elevated to Fifth Cir. 1982
Served
1975–1982
Appointed by
Gerald Ford (Republican)
Commissioned
December 12, 1975
Education
University of Alabama (B.A., 1960); University of Alabama School of Law (LL.B., 1961)
Signed orders read
17

About Judge Higginbotham

Patrick Errol Higginbotham was a judge of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Appointed by President Gerald Ford, Judge Higginbotham received a commission on December 12, 1975. Judge Higginbotham left the court on August 3, 1982 on appointment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

How Judge Higginbotham decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Cautions

For access-based constitutional claims, he examined whether a practical alternative channel remained available rather than treating the requested location as an absolute entitlement.

“When the usage of the Center by a tenant does not effectively render it a public forum, ISKCON may be excluded from the interior of the buildings because the outside sidewalks provide a reasonable effective means of soliciting and proselyting.6”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Air Line Pilots Association International v. Braniff Airways, Inc.
· 1976-03-29
Application for temporary injunction (Air Line Pilots Association International) Denied

“The application for a temporary injunction is denied.”

Richardson National Bank v. Reliance Insurance
· 1977-12-14
Summary judgment (plaintiff bank) Denied

“The motions for Summary Judgment will be denied.”

Summary judgment (defendant insurer) Denied
Aiken v. Neiman-Marcus
· 1977-12-05
Class certification (plaintiff) Denied

“The parties argued the prerequisites for class certification both orally and in extensive and excellent briefs. The evidence produced during this thorough discussion compels the holding that the plaintiff has failed to prove the existence of a class.”

George v. Beneficial Finance Co. of Dallas
· 1977-12-28
Class certification (plaintiffs) Denied

“For these reasons class certification is DENIED.”

Hill v. Singing Hills Funeral Home, Inc.
· 1978-02-03
Class certification (plaintiff) Granted

“It is THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that plaintiff’s Motion for Certification of Class should be and hereby is GRANTED.”

International Society for Krishna Consciousness v. Schrader
· 1978-05-05
Request for injunctive relief (plaintiffs) Granted in part

“All requests for injunctive relief are denied except those consistent with this memorandum. The parties will submit a proposed form of judgment.”

Turner v. Nelson-Dykes Co.
· 1978-10-19
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.”

OKC Corp. v. Williams
· 1979-02-03
Summary judgment (Securities and Exchange Commission) Granted

“The SEC’s motion for summary judgment on Phase I of this case is GRANTED.”

Motion to stay pending appeal (OKC Corporation) Denied

“Partial summary judgment therefore is granted. OKC’s motion for stay pending appeal is denied. See Midwest Growers Cooperative Corp. v. Kirkimo, 533 F.2d 455, 465 (9th Cir. 1976).”

Placid Oil Co. v. Federal Energy Administration
· 1979-02-26
Motion for partial summary judgment (Placid Oil Company) Denied

“Placid’s motion for partial summary judgment is denied, and FEA’s cross-motion for summary judgment on these issues is granted.”

Summary judgment (Federal Energy Administration) Granted
Summary judgment (Federal Energy Administration) Granted

“FEA’s motion for summary judgment on this issue is granted.”

Summary judgment (Federal Energy Administration) Granted

“On that ground the FEA’s motion for summary judgment on this issue is granted.”

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Amarillo National Bank
· 1979-06-08
Motion to intervene (OKC Corporation) Denied

“The proposed intervention is not proper under either subsection of Rule 24 and is hereby DENIED.”

Marshall v. Huffhines Steel Co.
· 1979-09-14
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.”

Quigley v. Braniff Airways, Inc.
· 1979-12-18
Class certification (plaintiff) Granted

“The court certifies the following class: All unsuccessful black applicants for flight *85attendant positions with the defendant from April 26, 1973, until December 31, 1975.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No matching historical assigned-case cohort was located, so this record makes no claim about Higginbotham's district-era caseload mix.

A historical record

Judge Higginbotham left this court for the U.S. Supreme Court. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.