David C. Godbey

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas Appointed by George W. Bush (Republican) 17 signed orders read

How Judge Godbey decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

On a motion to compel arbitration he treats FAA step one as contract formation, which the movant bears the burden to prove, and denies the motion where the movant fails to put the complete agreement (e.g. an omitted schedule) into the record.

“Because the Court cannot determine whether a valid and enforceable arbitration agreement exists between Stephens and DFW LinQ, the Court denies DFW LinQ's motion to dismiss and compel arbitration.”

Procedural preferences

On discovery disputes he holds Rule 34 entitles a party to electronically stored information in a native, usable format with metadata; an unreadable .dat load file does not satisfy the rule.

“Because Defendant Nasco Healthcare has not complied with Plaintiff Goodson's discovery requests for relevant information that are proportional to the needs of the case, the Court grants [the] motion to compel. ... Nasco Healthcare is ordered to produce documents responsive to Goodson's Second Request for Production Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 16, including associated metadata in a native format within fourteen (14) days of this Order.”

Cautions

He dismisses with prejudice a suit re-filed nearly identical to an earlier dismissed case where claim preclusion or limitations bars it.

“Because Aston has again failed to state a claim even after the opportunity to cure defects after its previous complaint was dismissed, the Court grants Wilmington's motion and dismisses Aston's claims with prejudice.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Alvarado v. Air Systems Components LP
3:19-cv-02057-N · 2022-03-15
Motion to compel discovery (plaintiff) Granted in part

“the Court denies Defendants' motion to quash the deposition notice served on ASC and grants Alvarado's motion to compel ASC's appearance. ... Because Alvarado has not shown good cause to conduct new depositions of JCI, Addington, or George, the Court denies her motion for leave to take these depositions and grants Defendants' corresponding motions to quash.”

Motion for protective order (defendant) Granted in part

“the Court grants Defendants' motion for protective order as to deposition topics 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 14 and grants in part Defendants' motion for protective order as to topics 10, 11, 12, and 13. The Court denies Defendants' motion for protective order as to all other topics in the notice.”

Intermed Services Management Co., LP v. Horseshoe, LLC
3:22-cv-00191-N · 2023-09-06
Motion to compel arbitration (defendant) Granted

“Upon evidentiary hearing, the Court concludes that the parties entered a valid agreement; thus, the Court grants the motion to compel and denies the motion to dismiss as moot.”

Motions to dismiss (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“the Court grants the motion to compel and denies the motion to dismiss as moot.”

Goodson v. Nasco Healthcare Inc.
3:21-cv-01467-N · 2023-08-28
Motion to compel discovery (plaintiff) Granted

“Because Defendant Nasco Healthcare has not complied with Plaintiff Goodson's discovery requests for relevant information that are proportional to the needs of the case, the Court grants [the] motion to compel. ... Nasco Healthcare is ordered to produce documents responsive to Goodson's Second Request for Production Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 16, including associated metadata in a native format within fourteen (14) days of this Order.”

Hart v. State Farm Lloyds
3:22-cv-01367-N · 2024-01-25
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“This Order addresses Defendant State Farm Lloyds' ('State Farm') motion for summary judgment [15]. For the reasons below, the Court grants summary judgment to State Farm on all claims.”

Stephens v. DFW LinQ Transport, Inc.
3:24-cv-00352-N · 2024-09-30
Motion to compel arbitration (defendant) Denied

“Because the Court cannot determine whether a valid and enforceable arbitration agreement exists between Stephens and DFW LinQ, the Court denies DFW LinQ's motion to dismiss and compel arbitration.”

Salt and Light Energy Equipment, LLC v. Origin Bancorp, Inc.
3:22-cv-00654-N · 2025-08-12
Motion for attorney fees (defendant) Granted

“For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion, but awards reduced fees as specified below. ... The Court awards Origin $1,059,334.10 in attorney's fees and $61,956.60 in related nontaxable expenses.”

Rotstain v. Trustmark National Bank (Stanford receivership / OSIC)
3:09-cv-2384-N · 2022-01-20
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“The Court concludes that fact issues exist as to the majority of Plaintiffs' nonabandoned claims. Defendants have, however, demonstrated entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on a subset of issues. Accordingly, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motions for summary judgment. ... the Court grants summary judgment in favor of TD Bank with respect to OSIC's constructive TUFTA claims and in favor of HSBC on any constructive TUFTA claim tied to conduct outside of the relevant limitations period. The Court denies summary judgment on all grounds asserted by the parties.”

Aston Custom Homes & Design, Inc. v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society FSB
3:23-cv-1639-N · 2023-11-14
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Because Aston has again failed to state a claim even after the opportunity to cure defects after its previous complaint was dismissed, the Court grants Wilmington's motion and dismisses Aston's claims with prejudice.”

Sasoro 13, LLC v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
3:22-cv-02313-N · 2023-02-27
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Because Sasoro has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the Court grants 7-Eleven's motion. The Court dismisses Sasoro's claims without prejudice and grants leave to amend... Sasoro may file a Second Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this order.”

Archer v. Kennedy
3:21-cv-748-N · 2023-07-17
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Because the Archers have not provided sufficient evidence of damages, the Court grants Kennedy's motion for summary judgment.”

Vela Wood PC v. Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc.
3:19-cv-1140-N · 2020-09-10
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“The Court denies Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and grants Associated Industries' motion for summary judgment.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The Court concludes that Associated Industries does not have a duty to defend Plaintiffs in the underlying JB&A lawsuit. The Court denies Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and grants Associated Industries' motion for summary judgment.”

Scroggins v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit
3:23-CV-1489-N · 2025-09-15
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Because Scroggins has not raised a genuine issue of material fact, the Court grants summary judgment to DART on these claims.”

Put Judge Godbey's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Godbey actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Godbey's own signed orders and cites them.