Mark X. Mullin

How Judge Mullin rules, drawn from 17 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas
Position
bankruptcy
Commissioned
2015-09-18
Education
Creighton University, B.S.B.A. in accounting, 1979; St. Mary's University School of Law, J.D., 1986
Signed orders read
17

How Judge Mullin decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A creditor can carry its nondischargeability burden with detailed evidence that the debtors knowingly used false representations and written financial information to obtain financing.

“Based on the findings of fact detailed above, the Court finds and concludes that ApplePie Capital has established through overwhelming evidence each of the required elements under § 523(a)(2)(B).”

Procedural preferences

Plan confirmation follows a requirement-by-requirement statutory analysis, including feasibility, creditor treatment, and class acceptance or cramdown standards.

“The Plan satisfies the requirements for confirmation set forth in Bankruptcy Code section 1191.”

Cautions

An exemption objection needs controverting proof; filing the objection alone does not overcome sworn schedules that otherwise provide adequate detail.

“The mere filing of an objection is not controverting evidence, and without controverting evidence, the sworn schedules carry the day.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

ApplePie Capital Inc. v. Booker
25-43057; 25-04148 · 2026-08-04
Claim to except debt from discharge (ApplePie Capital Inc.) Granted

“ApplePie Capital has established, by a preponderance of the evidence through overwhelming evidence, a nondischargeable claim under §§ 523(a)(2)(A) and (B) in the amount of $1,108,638.44, plus attorneys’ fees of $30,877.00.”

In re Jack County Hospital District d/b/a Faith Community Health System
20-42012-MXM · 2022-03-18
Plan confirmation (Jack County Hospital District d/b/a Faith Community Health System) Granted

“All requirements for confirmation of the Plan have been satisfied. The Plan is hereby CONFIRMED in its entirety pursuant to section 943 of the Bankruptcy Code, and all terms and conditions set forth in the Plan are hereby APPROVED.”

Triumphant Gold Limited v. Matloff
19-44253-MXM; 19-04127-MXM · 2022-03-24
Adversary complaint to except debt or deny discharge and object to exemptions (Triumphant Gold Limited) Denied

“Therefore, each of the claims and causes of action contained in Counts One, Two, Three, Four, and Five of the Complaint are denied. Additionally, the Court also finds and concludes that each of TGL’s objections to Mr. Matloff’s exemptions in Count Six are overruled and denied.”

In re Fore Machine, LLC, et al. (Aero Components, LLC)
22-40487-MXM · 2022-05-16
Plan confirmation (Aero Components, LLC) Granted

“The Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby CONFIRMED in each and every respect pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 1129.”

Motion to approve disclosure statement (Aero Components, LLC) Granted

“The Disclosure Statement is hereby APPROVED on a final basis in all respects.”

In re Fore Machine, LLC, et al. (Liquidating Debtors)
22-40487-MXM · 2022-05-16
Plan confirmation (Fore Aero Holdings, LLC, Fore Machine, LLC, and Fore Capital Holding, LLC) Granted

“The Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby CONFIRMED in each and every respect pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 1129.”

Motion to approve disclosure statement (Fore Aero Holdings, LLC, Fore Machine, LLC, and Fore Capital Holding, LLC) Granted

“The Disclosure Statement is hereby APPROVED on a final basis in all respects.”

In re Rockall Energy Holdings, LLC, et al.
22-90000-MXM · 2022-06-02
Motion to approve disclosure statement (Rockall Energy Holdings, LLC and affiliated debtors) Granted

“The Disclosure Statement and Disclosure Statement Supplement (i) contain adequate information of a kind generally consistent with the disclosure requirements of all applicable non-bankruptcy law, including the Securities Act, (ii) contain ‘adequate information’ (as such term is defined in section 1125(a)(1) and used in section 1126(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code) with respect to the Debtors, the Plan, and the transactions contemplated therein, and (iii) are approved on a final basis in all respects.”

Plan confirmation (Rockall Energy Holdings, LLC and affiliated debtors) Granted

“The Plan is approved in its entirety and CONFIRMED under section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code.”

Motion to approve sale of assets (Rockall Energy Holdings, LLC and affiliated debtors) Granted

“The Debtors, Reorganized Debtors, and Liquidation Trustee, as applicable, are authorized to undertake the transactions contemplated by the PSA, including pursuant to sections 363, 365, and 1123(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Code.”

Toxpro Laboratories, LLC, et al. v. Rosenburg
20-40753-MXM; 20-04046-MXM · 2022-09-06
Adversary complaint to except debt and deny discharge (Toxpro Laboratories, LLC and related plaintiffs) Denied

“Therefore, each of the claims and causes of action contained in Counts One, Two, Three, and Four of the Complaint are denied.”

In re Victoria Florita Durand-Day; In re Lavonda Latrece Evans
22-40089-MXM; 22-40625-MXM · 2022-10-26
Objection to plan confirmation (Pam Bassel, standing chapter 13 trustee, in the Durand-Day case) Denied

“ORDERED that the Trustee’s Objections are OVERRULED;”

Objection to plan confirmation (Pam Bassel, standing chapter 13 trustee, in the Evans case) Denied
Plan confirmation (Victoria Florita Durand-Day) Granted

“ORDERED that the Debtors’ Amended Plans are CONFIRMED;”

Plan confirmation (Lavonda Latrece Evans) Granted
In re SRAK Corporation
22-40931-MXM · 2023-03-21
Plan confirmation (SRAK Corporation) Granted

“The Plan, which includes any and all modifications or supplementations, including any modifications set forth on the record at the Confirmation Hearing, is APPROVED and CONFIRMED under Bankruptcy Code section 1191 in its entirety.”

In re Jess Hall's Serendipity, LLC
23-40073-MXM · 2023-05-24
Plan confirmation (Jess Hall's Serendipity, LLC) Granted

“The Plan, as modified by this Confirmation Order, shall be, and hereby is, confirmed pursuant to section 1191 of the Bankruptcy Code.”

In re Leading Life Senior Living, Inc.
22-42784-MXM · 2023-06-29
Plan confirmation (Leading Life Senior Living, Inc.) Granted

“The Plan, which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 1 shall be, and hereby is, APPROVED and CONFIRMED pursuant to section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code.”

Blu Hawk Enterprises, Inc. v. Cournoyer
22-42299-MXM; 23-04006-MXM · 2023-10-31
Adversary complaint to deny discharge (Blu Hawk Enterprises, Inc.) Denied

“Therefore, each of the claims and causes of action contained in Counts One, Two, and Three of the Complaint are DENIED and DISMISSED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Five matters were terminated and the corresponding ApplePie adversary remained pending in the index. The historical streams supplied no express motion disposition; the adversary supplied one final claim outcome after trial.

Draft for Judge Mullin with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Mullin, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Mullin's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace