Edward L. Morris

How Judge Morris rules, drawn from 30 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas
Position
bankruptcy
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Commissioned
2018-11-22
Signed orders read
30

How Judge Morris decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

A debtor's complete and accurate schedules are essential; repeated material omissions and failure to correct them can support denial of discharge.

“A debtor’s full disclosure of his assets and liabilities in his Schedules and full disclosure of his financial affairs in his SOFA are essential to the bankruptcy process”

Procedural preferences

A bankruptcy filing challenged as bad faith may survive when the debtor demonstrates a valid reorganizational purpose and a rational process for addressing claims.

“Stephens has successfully established a valid reorganizational purpose to the bankruptcy filing.”

Injunctive relief is evaluated request by request, with relief denied where a proposed restriction is not tied to a viable claim or duplicates ordinary discovery duties.

“These forms of relief are not appropriate for inclusion within a TRO under the facts and circumstances of this case.”

Cautions

Knowingly asserting estate-owned claims without authorization can result in contempt, an injunction, and compensatory sanctions.

“the Debtor be and is hereby found to be in CONTEMPT for filing each of the Post-Petition Lawsuits in violation of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(3)”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Next Science, LLC v. Pivotal Med Supply, LLC
25-40248; 25-04036 · 2026-04-13
Motions to dismiss (Next Science, LLC) Granted

“ORDERED that the Dismissal Motion is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that each of Defendant’s Counterclaims is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.”

Neary v. Keylor (In re Keylor)
20-04050 · 2023-07-10
Objection to chapter 7 discharge (William T. Neary, United States Trustee) Granted

“the U.S. Trustee’s objection under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(A) to the grant of a discharge to Keylor will be sustained and Keylor will be denied such discharge.”

Neary v. Lindeman and Gordon (In re Lindeman)
19-04103 · 2022-04-19
Objection to chapter 7 discharge (William T. Neary, United States Trustee, and Bryan Taylor) Granted

“For all of the foregoing reasons, the Plaintiffs’ objections to the grant of a discharge to the Debtors under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a) will be sustained and the Debtors will be denied such discharge.”

Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP v. Kuper (In re Kuper)
20-04062 · 2023-10-17
Objection to chapter 7 discharge (Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP) Denied

“BNM’s objections under 11 U.S.C. §§ 727(a)(2)(A) and 727(a)(4) to the grant of a discharge to the Kupers will be overruled”

Request for nondischargeability determination (Bell Nunnally & Martin LLP) Denied

“BNM’s request for a determination of nondischargeability of the BNM Debt under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) will be denied.”

Coleman County State Bank v. Boyd (In re Boyd)
17-04089 · 2024-02-12
Request for judgment on guaranty claims (Coleman County State Bank) Granted

“Coleman will be awarded judgment against Mr. Boyd”

Objection to chapter 7 discharge (Coleman County State Bank) Granted

“Mr. Boyd’s chapter 7 discharge will be denied based upon a sustaining of Coleman’s objections pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 727(a)(2)(A) (to the extent predicated upon fraudulent concealment), (a)(3), (a)(4)(A), (a)(5), and (a)(7)”

Request for nondischargeability determination (Coleman County State Bank) Moot / procedural

“such claims will be dispensed with as moot based upon the denial of Mr. Boyd’s chapter 7 discharge;”

In re Buffalo Station, LLC, et al.
22-42943 et al. · 2024-04-08
Request for chapter 11 plan confirmation (Chapter 11 trustee) Granted

“The Plan and each of its provisions, as modified herein, is confirmed under Bankruptcy Code § 1129.”

Anderson v. Tatum (In re Tatum)
20-04027 · 2024-04-08
Request for nondischargeability determination (James P. Anderson) Denied

“Mr. Anderson’s objection to the discharge of the Judgment Debt under § 523(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code will be denied.”

In re Regina Nachael Howell Foster
12-43804 · 2024-05-28
Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (Regina Nachael Howell Foster) Denied

“ORDERED that the Jurisdictional Motion is DENIED;”

Motion for vexatious litigant injunction (Areya Holder Aurzada, Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“ORDERED that the Vexatious Litigant Motion is DENIED, but without prejudice”

Tiburon Land and Cattle, LP v. Stephens
21-04040 · 2024-08-20
Motion for entry of judgment (Tiburon Land and Cattle, LP and Trek Resources, Inc.) Denied

“the Court will deny the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment”

Motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (Kerwin Burl Stephens, Thunderbird Oil & Gas, LLC, and Thunderbird Resources, LLC) Granted in part

“grant in part, and deny in part, the Defendants’ JNOV Motion”

Five Point Dental Specialists, Inc. v. Benham
24-04068 · 2024-08-27
Application for temporary restraining order (Five Point Dental Specialists, Inc., FPDS Benham Sub, LLC, and Benham Orthodontics, P.A.) Granted in part

“the Court will separately issue a temporary restraining order that grants in part, and denies in part, the TRO Application”

Five Point Dental Specialists, Inc. v. Benham
24-04068 · 2024-12-23
Application for preliminary injunction (Five Point Dental Specialists, Inc., FPDS Benham Sub, LLC, and Benham Orthodontics, P.A.) Granted in part

“the Court will separately issue a preliminary injunction that grants in part, and denies in part, the PI Application”

Vida v. Asset Protection Auto, LLC (In re Matrix Warranty Solutions, Inc.)
24-04040 · 2025-03-03
Default judgment (Behrooz P. Vida, Chapter 7 trustee) Granted in part

“the Bankruptcy Court respectfully recommends that the reference of this adversary proceeding to the Bankruptcy Court be withdrawn and that the Default Judgment Motion be granted, denying only the Trustee’s request for an award of AP Claim Expenses against Asset Protection and Large.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The five early-service matters were terminated. The open Next Science adversary supplied one express dismissal outcome.

Draft for Judge Morris with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Morris, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Morris's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace