Thad Heartfield

How Judge Heartfield rules, drawn from 18 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Heartfield no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled here.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Position
District judge
Status
Deceased
Served
1995–2022
Appointed by
Bill Clinton (Democratic)
Commissioned
March 17, 1995
Education
St. Mary's University (B.A., 1962); St. Mary's University School of Law (J.D., 1965)
Signed orders read
18

About Judge Heartfield

Thad Heartfield was a judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Appointed by President William J. Clinton, Judge Heartfield received a commission on March 17, 1995. Judge Heartfield assumed senior status on January 1, 2010 and served until death on December 27, 2022.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Jones v. State
· 1995-07-26
Motion to proceed ifp (plaintiff) Granted

“is GRANTED. A Final Judgment will be entered separately.”

Nickerson v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
· 1995-08-03
Social security appeal (claimant) Denied

“the decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services is AFFIRMED, and this case is DISMISSED.”

Lavergne v. Jefferson County
· 1995-12-18
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“defendant Jefferson County, Texas’ Motion For Summary Judgment is GRANTED”

Jacobs v. Port Neches Police Department
· 1996-01-03
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“ORDERED and ADJUDGED that defendant Jefferson County Sheriffs Department is DISMISSED, without prejudice, as a party to this suit.”

Dugas v. Jefferson County
· 1996-06-21
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Payne’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.”

White v. Orange Auto Center
· 2000-06-05
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“defendants Orange Auto Center’s and Clay Higgins’ Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.”

Voight v. R.L. Eldridge Construction Inc.
· 2006-02-08
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment (Docket No. 46) is GRANTED.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“defendant’s Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss (Docket No. 47) is GRANTED.”

Von Drake v. United States
· 2006-06-02
Petition for review (petitioner) Denied

“ORDERED that plaintiffs action is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.”

Lavergne v. HCA Inc.
· 2006-08-31
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“‘Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment’ (Docket No. 18) is GRANTED.”

Sparks v. Reneau Publishing Inc.
· 2007-08-02
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doe. No. 29] is GRANTED and all claims against Defendant shall be dismissed.”

Motion for sanctions (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant’s Motion for Expenses Under Rule 37(c)(2) [Doc. No. 41] is GRANTED IN PART”

Motions to strike (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s Objections and Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Summary Judgment Evidence [Doc. No. 37] is OVERRULED and DENIED.”

Motion for leave to file (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiffs First Motion for Leave to File Out of Time Plaintiffs Case Specific Disclosures [Doe. No. 42] is GRANTED.”

Motion for leave to file (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Summary Judgment Evidence in Response to Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 48] is GRANTED.”

United States v. Walters
· 2007-11-01
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“defendant’s motion to suppress (Docket No. 28) is DENIED.”

Scott v. Pfizer Inc.
· 2008-02-21
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants Pfizer, Howmedica, and MTG’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Clerk’s doc. # 37] is GRANTED”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“Plaintiffs claims for malice/fraud and misrepresentation, as set forth in Sections IX and X of his Amended Petition are dismissed, including the corresponding request for exemplary damages, with prejudice”

Motion for more definite statement (defendant) Moot / procedural

“is DENIED as MOOT with respect to the motion for a more definite statement”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

His docket mixed a substantial civil caseload (product liability, employment, ERISA, admiralty, Social Security) with a large prisoner/habeas volume routinely referred to the division's magistrate judges. Cases filed before his 1995 commission that appear under his name are inherited administrative reassignments and are excluded.

Pending matters in the official report

Judge Heartfield was last listed in the Civil Justice Reform Act report as of March 31, 2024.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202400
Sep 202200
Mar 202200
Sep 202100
Mar 202100
Sep 202000

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

A historical record

Judge Heartfield no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled here. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.