Robert William Schroeder III

“ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss ... are GRANTED. ... ORDERED that My Health's complaints ... are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

“ORDERED that Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings (Docket No. 35) is DENIED.”

“ORDERED that the AUO Non-Infringement MSJ (Docket No. 252) is DENIED.”

“ORDERED the motion to dismiss filed by the Defendant Dr. Reginaldo Stanley (Docket No. 17) is GRANTED and the claims against Dr. Stanley are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.”

“Defendants’ motions are DENIED as to the Defendants’ requests that Plaintiff’s claims be dismissed.”

“ORDERED that Defendant MoneyGram International, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss for Improper Venue, or Alternatively, Motion to Transfer Venue Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406 (Docket No. 5) and Defendant MoneyGram Payment Systems, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 23) are GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. ... Defendants’ motions are GRANTED as to.the requests that the cause of action be transferred.”

“HP’s Motion to Compel (Docket No. 103) is DENIED, the Motion to Expedite Briefing is DENIED-AS-MOOT”

“Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash (Docket No. 105) is GRANTED. However, Plaintiff shall produce Mr. Vijh for a deposition within 30 days from the date of this order.”

“Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss or Stay Pending Action (Docket No. 14) is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED pending resolution of the arbitration proceeding.”

“ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief (Docket Nos. 7, 9) and his motion to compel the Court to act on his motions for injunctive relief (Docket No. 12) are DENIED-AS-MOOT.”

“ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion seeking release while the petition is pending (Docket No. 25) and Petitoner’s related motions (Docket Nos. 32, 33) are DENIED-AS-MOOT.”

“Defendant’s motion to compel judgment on his motion to appoint counsel (Docket No. 34) is DENIED-AS-MOOT.”

“ORDERED that SynQor’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment on Vicor’s § 112 Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims (Docket No. 379) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the asserted claims of the ’190 and ’702 patents are NOT INVALID for failure to comply with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112.”

“ORDERED that Defendant Vicor Corporation’s Motion for the Involuntary Dismissal of the ’290 Patent (Docket No. 339) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that that the Fourth Claim for infringement of the ’290 patent and Vicor’s Affirmative Defenses and Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims relating to the infringement, validity and enforceability of the ’290 patent are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

“ORDERED that the Hisense ’788 MSJ (Docket No. 253) is GRANTED-IN-PART and otherwise DENIED.”

“ORDERED that the AUO ’788 MSJ (Docket No. 255) is DENIED.”

“ORDERED that the AUO Willfulness MSJ (Docket No. 250) is GRANTED-IN-PART and otherwise DENIED.”