Katie Nicole Mitchell

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas magistrate 32 signed orders read

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. MediaTek Inc.
· 2014-05-12
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“For the reasons stated herein, the Court adopts the constructions set forth below and RECOMMENDS DENYING the Motion for Summary Judgment.”

Loco Brands, LLC d/b/a Direct TEK v. Butler America, LLC, and Frontier Communications Corporation
· 2019-05-29
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“The Report recommends granting-in-part and denying-in-part both motions.”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“the Magistrate Judge’s Report (Docket No. 95) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.”

Leadon Jr. v. Collier
· 2021-01-25
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“DENIES Defendant Oputy’s motion to dismiss (Docket No. 28)”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendants Bradley, Wallace, and Lambo’s motion to dismiss (Docket No. 27)”

Padieu v. Philips
· 2022-01-04
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for temporary injunctive relief (Docket No. 32).”

Green v. Love
· 2019-01-07

In a pro se prisoner Section 1983 suit, Mitchell's R&R recommended sua sponte dismissal with prejudice for purposes of in forma pauperis proceedings under the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), and dismissal of claims against two judges as legally frivolous under Section 1915A because of absolute judicial immunity. The district judge adopted the R&R over the plaintiff's objections and denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Kimble v. Davis
· 2022-03-31

In a pro se prisoner Section 1983 suit, Mitchell's R&R recommended sua sponte dismissal with prejudice for failure to state a claim and failure to prosecute because the plaintiff did not file an updated change of address and the report was returned undeliverable. No objections were filed, and District Judge Kernodle adopted the R&R.

Skinner v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
· 2021-09-10
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“The court reverses the commissioner's final administrative decision and remands the matter to the commissioner for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”

Powers v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
· 2024-03-20
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“The court affirms the Commissioner's final administrative decision and dismisses this action with prejudice.”

Ballenger v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
· 2024-04-01
Motions to remand (defendant) Granted

“Defendant's unopposed motion to reverse with remand and enter judgment (Doc. 12) is granted. Defendant's unfavorable final decision denying plaintiff's claim for disability insurance benefits is reversed, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”

Marples v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
· 2020-04-22
Motions to dismiss (court) Moot / procedural

“This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).”

Cook v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
· 2021-06-04
Motions to remand (defendant) Granted

“The court grants the motion to reverse with remand. The court reverses the commissioner's final administrative decision and remands the matter to the commissioner for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”

Mendoza-Contreras v. United States
· 2019-02-02
Habeas petition (petitioner) Denied

“Movant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence is DISMISSED with prejudice. Movant is also denied a certificate of appealability sua sponte.”

Put Judge Mitchell's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Mitchell actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Mitchell's own signed orders and cites them.