Katie Nicole Mitchell
How Judge Mitchell rules, drawn from 32 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“For the reasons stated herein, the Court adopts the constructions set forth below and RECOMMENDS DENYING the Motion for Summary Judgment.”
“The Report recommends granting-in-part and denying-in-part both motions.”
“the Magistrate Judge’s Report (Docket No. 95) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.”
“DENIES Defendant Oputy’s motion to dismiss (Docket No. 28)”
“Defendants Bradley, Wallace, and Lambo’s motion to dismiss (Docket No. 27)”
“DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for temporary injunctive relief (Docket No. 32).”
In a pro se prisoner Section 1983 suit, Mitchell's R&R recommended sua sponte dismissal with prejudice for purposes of in forma pauperis proceedings under the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), and dismissal of claims against two judges as legally frivolous under Section 1915A because of absolute judicial immunity. The district judge adopted the R&R over the plaintiff's objections and denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
In a pro se prisoner Section 1983 suit, Mitchell's R&R recommended sua sponte dismissal with prejudice for failure to state a claim and failure to prosecute because the plaintiff did not file an updated change of address and the report was returned undeliverable. No objections were filed, and District Judge Kernodle adopted the R&R.
“The court reverses the commissioner's final administrative decision and remands the matter to the commissioner for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”
“The court affirms the Commissioner's final administrative decision and dismisses this action with prejudice.”
“Defendant's unopposed motion to reverse with remand and enter judgment (Doc. 12) is granted. Defendant's unfavorable final decision denying plaintiff's claim for disability insurance benefits is reversed, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”
“This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).”
“The court grants the motion to reverse with remand. The court reverses the commissioner's final administrative decision and remands the matter to the commissioner for further administrative proceedings pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).”
“Movant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence is DISMISSED with prejudice. Movant is also denied a certificate of appealability sua sponte.”
Draft for Judge Mitchell with the record in hand
Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Mitchell, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Grounded in Judge Mitchell's own signed orders
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace