Robert Malcolm McRae Jr.

How Judge McRae rules, drawn from 28 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge McRae no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1966–2004
Appointed by
Lyndon B. Johnson (Democratic)
Commissioned
1966-11-03
Education
Vanderbilt University, B.A. (1943); University of Virginia School of Law, LL.B. (1948)
Signed orders read
28

How Judge McRae decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

McRae treated a party’s admission and stipulation as sufficient to eliminate the remaining factual dispute on liability.

“The only genuine issue of material fact (i. e., whether the defendant discharges pollutants in contravention of 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a), 1342(a), and 1317(d)) was resolved by admission and stipulation”

Procedural preferences

McRae declined summary judgment when the record presented a genuine factual dispute over the reason for an employee’s discharge.

“To sustain a motion for summary judgment, the defendants must show that there are no genuine issues of material fact in dispute.”

Cautions

McRae enforced filing deadlines even when he considered the resulting dismissal harsh.

“This Court therefore has no choice but to dismiss this Plaintiff’s Title VII action.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Webster v. Liberty Cash Grocers, Inc.
· 1975-06-24
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“It is therefore ordered that the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and that this action be dismissed in accordance with that order.”

Bryant v. Blanton
· 1979-01-11
Motion for judgment on pleadings (plaintiff) Granted

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff be granted a Judgment on the pleadings”

Application for injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“Therefore, the Court denies plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief.”

Amerace Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
· 1976-06-10
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is therefore granted in part and denied in part, this opinion constituting the final judgment in this action.”

Hunt v. Schlesinger
· 1974-12-30
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“It is, therefore, ordered that the motion is denied on all grounds and the discovery should proceed forthwith.”

White v. Hughes
· 1975-11-24
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“Therefore, it is Ordered that the Motions for Remand filed in C-75-56-E and C-75-57-E are hereby granted.”

United States v. York
· 1966-12-06
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Therefore, the summary judgment of the defendants should be granted.”

Orgill Brothers & Co. v. United States
· 1974-03-01
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“It is, therefore, ordered that the plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be denied”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.”

Mungen v. Choctaw, Inc.
· 1975-06-18
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“This Court therefore has no choice but to dismiss this Plaintiff’s Title VII action.”

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
· 1987-01-14
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Therefore the defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby granted.”

Samuels v. Heckler
· 1986-08-19
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted in part

“Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part (see part A).”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Motion for Decertification are denied (see parts B and C, respectively).”

Motion to decertify class (defendant) Denied

“The defendants’ Motion to Decertify is denied.”

United States v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.
· 1976-11-10
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Therefore, it is Ordered that defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is hereby denied on all grounds.”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“the plaintiff is entitled to a Summary Judgment that the defendant has violated 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a), 1342(a) and 1317(d)”

Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Grosvenor
· 1976-10-27
Motion for judgment on pleadings (plaintiff) Granted

“the plaintiff is entitled to a Declaratory Judgment as a matter of law”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The twenty located assigned records were concentrated in personal-property, contract, civil-rights, and statutory matters. The sparse historical timelines do not support a complete caseload, duration, or motion-timing claim.

A historical record

Judge McRae no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.