James Dale Todd

How Judge Todd rules, drawn from 25 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Todd no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Position
district
Status
Retired 2021
Served
1985–2021
Appointed by
Ronald Reagan (Republican)
Commissioned
1985-07-11
Education
Lambuth College, B.S. (1965); University of Mississippi, M.C.S. (1968); Memphis State University Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law, J.D. (1972)
Signed orders read
25

How Judge Todd decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Todd measured the jurisdictional amount at the time the federal action began, preventing later exchange-rate changes from defeating jurisdiction.

“The general rule of the Sixth Circuit requires a determination of the amount in controversy at the time the action is commenced in district court.”

Procedural preferences

Todd treated document requests served domestically as domestic discovery even when the requested materials were located abroad.

“requests for production of documents served on a party in this country are held to occur in this country even though the documents may be located in a foreign state.”

Cautions

Todd found that litigating a dispositive motion in state court before removal waived the defendant’s right to remove.

“Having lost that motion, defendant may not now ‘appeal’ the state court’s decision to this court by removal.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Monroe ex rel. C.B.D. v. McNairy County
· 2007-11-06
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the motion for summary judgment of Defendants City of Selmer and Michael Gilbert is GRANTED”

Truett v. Bowman
· 2003-08-18
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Secretary’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is GRANTED.”

Dotson v. Correctional Medical Services
· 2008-11-03
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Smith’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED”

Capital Law v. Viar
· 2004-09-24
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED.”

Pinnix v. Pollock
· 2004-04-05
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.”

Hugueley v. Dresden Police Department
· 2007-01-12
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendants’ motions for summary judgment as to Plaintiffs Fourth Amendment claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are hereby GRANTED.”

Tucker v. Hardin County
· 2006-08-10
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant Hardin County’s motion for summary judgment on all claims is GRANTED.”

Pennington v. Thompson
· 2003-01-10
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is DENIED”

Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion for summary judg *937 ment is GRANTED.”

Lea v. United States
· 1995-01-31
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“The United States’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.”

Tuggles v. Leroy-Somer, Inc.
· 2004-06-14
Appeal of clerk cost award (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiffs appeal of the Clerk’s award of costs is DENIED.”

In re Grand Jury Subpoena
· 1988-06-14
Motion to quash (recipient) Denied

“Therefore, the motion to quash is DENIED.”

Grinnell Corp. v. Local Union 854
· 1993-08-12
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“Grin-nell’s motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“The Union’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The eight sampled terminated matters consisted mainly of prisoner civil-rights cases, plus one employment civil-rights case and one habeas matter. This targeted oldest-case sample is not a complete caseload measure.

A historical record

Judge Todd no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.