Jimmy L. Croom

How Judge Croom rules, drawn from 26 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Position
Bankruptcy judge
Appointed by
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Commissioned
March 20, 2013
Education
University of Tennessee at Martin, B.A. in Business Administration with a major in Accounting, high honors; University of Memphis Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law, J.D.
Signed orders read
26

About Judge Croom

Jimmy L. Croom is Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Western District of Tennessee, a position he assumed in April 2026. Before joining the bankruptcy bench, he worked for eighteen years as an Assistant United States Attorney in the district.

Judge Croom's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Croom, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Contacting chambers

Submit written communications about pending cases as pleadings rather than letters.

“Letters to the Judge regarding pending cases are discouraged; written communication ordinarily should be through pleadings.”

Filing

Submit proposed Chapter 13 orders to the Chapter 13 trustee.

“Proposed orders in Chapter 13 cases must be submitted to the Chapter 13 Trustee.”

Conferences

Request a telephone appearance from the courtroom deputy by noon the day before the hearing.

“If you would like to appear telephonically, please contact Courtroom Deputy Melissa Beacham NO LATER THAN noon the day prior to your hearing.”

Conferences

For Chapter 13 matters, give announcements and continuance requests to the trustee at least one day before the 10 a.m. hearing.

“announcements or requests for continuances must be presented to the Chapter 13 Trustee at least one day prior to the date of a scheduled 10:00 a.m. hearing.”

Trial

Do not appear by telephone for a trial, evidentiary hearing, or witness examination.

“Telephonic appearances are NOT allowed if the matter requires a trial, evidentiary hearing, or witness examination.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 10, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Croom decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Detailed valuation methodology and explained adjustments carried more weight than an unsupported bottom-line estimate.

“He thoroughly explained how he arrived at a value of $69,200.00 for the mobile home.”

A secured creditor's lack of notice of a sale supported relief from the prior sale orders and recovery of the proceeds.

“failure to serve AgDirect with notice of the motion to sell and the orders related thereto resulted in a lack of due process”

Procedural preferences

A dischargeability complaint must plead concrete facts that make undue hardship plausible.

“The Debtor in this case has failed to set forth sufficient facts that make relief seem plausible in this adversary proceeding.”

Cautions

A request to continue the automatic stay must be filed and heard before the statutory period expires.

“The automatic stay in this case terminated on November 21, 2024, and the Court lost its authority to reinstate the stay at that time.”

A taxing authority seeking estate funds held by a Chapter 13 trustee must first obtain relief from the automatic stay.

“the IRS must first seek and obtain leave from the automatic stay before seeking to enforce notices of levy against creditors in any pending bankruptcy cases”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Weems v. State of North Dakota (In re Weems)
23-10576; 24-05017 · 2025-02-11
Motions to dismiss (State of North Dakota d/b/a Bank of North Dakota) Granted

“The Complaint in this adversary proceeding is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.”

In re Phyllis A. Staten
24-11397 · 2025-02-05
Motion to impose or extend automatic stay (Phyllis A. Staten) Denied

“It is THEREFORE ORDERED that Debtor’s Motion to Impose Stay Under Section 362(c)(4) as to All Creditors (ECF No. 36) is DENIED.”

In re Expertus Health, LLC
23-11673 · 2024-11-21
Motion to determine secured status and avoid lien (Expertus Health, LLC) Granted in part

“the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART the Debtor’s Motion Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(A)(1) and Rule 3012”

In re Herbert L. Parsons, Jr. and Vickie A. Parsons
07-10113 · 2023-11-09
Motion for unclaimed funds (Herbert L. Parsons, Jr. and Vickie A. Parsons) Denied

“the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Debtors’ Pro Se Application for Payment of Unclaimed Funds (ECF No. 187).”

In re John H. Smith
19-10939 · 2020-09-22
Motion for relief from order and sale proceeds (Farm Credit Services of America, PCA d/b/a AgDirect) Granted

“the Court GRANTS AgDirect’s Motion for Relief from Order Granting Debtor Authority to Sell Asset Free and Clear of Lien, Claim and Encumbrance, and Request for Correction of Priority and Entitlement to Proceeds from Sale to Paul Herbert”

In re Blankenship Farms, LP
16-10840 · 2019-05-03
Summary judgment (Chapter 11 Trustee) Granted

“the trustee’s motion is GRANTED.”

Application for allowance of administrative expense (CNH Industrial Capital America, LLC) Denied

“CNHi’s Application for Allowance of Administrative Expenses is DENIED.”

In re James Trent Blankenship and Wendi Deann Blankenship
16-10839 · 2019-05-03
Summary judgment (Chapter 7 Trustee) Granted

“the trustee’s motion is GRANTED.”

Application for allowance of administrative expense (CNH Industrial Capital America, LLC) Denied

“CNHi’s Application for Allowance of Administrative Expenses is DENIED.”

Agrifund, LLC v. Blankenship
16-10839 / 17-5098 · 2019-04-25
Motion to strike items from record on appeal (Agrifund, LLC d/b/a Ag Resource Management) Denied

“the Motion to Strike Certain Items from Appellants’ Designation of Record on Appeal filed by Agrifund, LLC, dba Ag Resources Management (‘ARM’), on March 27, 2019 is HEREBY DENIED.”

In re Joe M. Smith and Angela J. Smith
14-12505 · 2019-01-07
Objection to claimed exemptions (Chapter 7 Trustee) Denied

“the Court will issue an order denying the Trustee’s objection to the Debtors’ amended claimed exemptions.”

In re The Law Offices of T. Robert Hill, P.C.
17-10597 · 2017-06-20
Motion for abstention (Boren & Boyd, P.C. and related movants) Granted

“Movants’ Motion for Abstention Under 11 U.S.C. § 305 is GRANTED.”

In re Rebecca Reed
16-12548 · 2017-05-15
Objection to plan confirmation (21st Mortgage Corporation) Granted in part

“21st Mortgage Corporation’s Objection to Confirmation as to the Debtor’s proposed valuation of the 2007 Clayton mobile home is SUSTAINED.”

In re Jacqueline Carol McDaniel
16-12461 · 2017-05-10
Objection to claimed exemptions (Chapter 7 Trustee) Granted

“the Trustee’s Objection is SUSTAINED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

All six matters were terminated. The five oldest sampled matters supplied no express disposition, while the Weems adversary supplied one dismissal outcome.

Draft for Judge Croom with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Croom, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Croom's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace