Lynda M. Hill

How Judge Hill rules, drawn from 4 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Position
Magistrate judge
Commissioned
August 1, 2026
Education
University of the South, B.A., 1993; University of Tennessee College of Law, J.D., 1998; Vanderbilt University Owen Graduate School of Management, M.B.A., 2015
Signed orders read
4

About Judge Hill

Lynda M. Hill began serving as a United States Magistrate Judge for the Middle District of Tennessee in August 2026. She previously served as the court’s Clerk of Court and practiced commercial litigation in Nashville and Chattanooga. She earned a J.D. from the University of Tennessee College of Law and an M.B.A. from Vanderbilt University.

Judge Hill's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Hill, as published on the court's website (checked November 2, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Motions

Seek leave before filing a partial summary judgment motion.

“Motions for partial summary judgment shall not be filed without leave of Court.”

Motions

File a motion to change a case management deadline at least seven days before the earliest affected deadline.

“Any motion to modify the case management order or any case management deadline must be filed at least seven (7) days in advance of the earliest impacted deadline.”

Discovery

Lead counsel must meet in person and try to resolve discovery disputes before asking the court to intervene.

“The joint discovery dispute statement must certify that lead counsel for all parties conducted the required in-person meeting and made a good faith effort to resolve each discovery dispute presented in the statement.”

Discovery

After the in person meeting, file a joint motion for a discovery conference with a joint dispute statement.

“Discovery disputes that cannot be resolved after the in-person meeting must be brought promptly to the attention of the Magistrate Judge by filing a joint motion for a discovery conference and an accompanying joint discovery dispute statement.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Hill decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Harrison v. Commissioner of Social Security, Hill remanded after finding that the administrative law judge had not substantively addressed medical assessments about the claimant’s wheelchair.

“Accordingly, remand is required.”

Procedural preferences

In DeBerry v. Youker, Hill stayed discovery and proceedings while a qualified immunity dismissal motion remained pending.

“A stay is warranted because the pending motion to dismiss raises the defense of qualified immunity.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

DeBerry v. Youker
3:26-cv-00360
Motions to stay (defendant) Granted

“Defendant’s motion to stay (Docket Entry No. 18) is GRANTED.”

Motion to intervene (nonparty) Denied

“The motion (Docket Entry No. 11) of non-party Robert Gordon to intervene and join is DENIED.”

Woodard v. Commissioner of Social Security
3:25-cv-01174
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff’s motion (Docket No. 10) is DENIED.”

Harrison v. Commissioner of Social Security
3:25-cv-01406
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Granted

“Plaintiff’s motion (Docket No. 13) is GRANTED.”

Weatherford v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
3:26-cv-00060
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff’s motion (Docket No. 12) is DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The sampled docket records include newly assigned Social Security appeals and criminal duty matters, plus inherited consent appeals and a referred prisoner civil rights case.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, not for Judge Hill: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed1,1388.7 months
Closed with no court action5767.5 months
Closed before pretrial5439.4 months
Closed during or after pretrial9not reported
Closed during trial1028.1 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20251,1388.7 months
Sep 20241,2627.6 months
Sep 20231,0908.9 months
Sep 202298711 months
Sep 20211,00710.6 months
Sep 202089010.3 months
Sep 201998210.7 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Hill with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Hill, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Hill's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace