Luke A. Evans

United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee magistrate 12 signed orders read

How Judge Evans decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

On a Rule 12(b)(6) motion against a pro se complaint he recommends dismissal for group-pleading failure and non-response under LR 7.01, but expressly declines dismissal with prejudice; a pleading deficiency at that stage warrants only a without-prejudice dismissal.

“IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8) be GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Procedural preferences

Attentive to the 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) limit on a magistrate's authority over dispositive motions; where a trial has been postponed he denies competing exclusion and voluntary-dismissal motions and resets the discovery schedule rather than forcing a premature disposition.

“Accordingly, the Court denies both pending motions. (Doc. Nos. 26, 30.)”

Cautions

Declines to dismiss for discovery misconduct where the parties never met and conferred as Rule 37 and the local rules require and the movant sat on its accusations across multiple joint status reports.

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court recommends that CSX's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 196) be denied.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Flint v. Feit Electric Company, Inc.
3:24-cv-00324
Motion to exclude (defendant) Denied

“Accordingly, the Court denies both pending motions. (Doc. Nos. 26, 30.)”

Motion for voluntary dismissal (plaintiff) Denied
Rigney v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
3:22-cv-00342
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the Court recommends that CSX's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 196) be denied.”

Wiseman v. Super Ego Holdings, LLC
3:26-cv-00175
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8) be GRANTED and Plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Gordon v. Williamson County Sheriff's Office
3:24-cv-01121
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Court ADOPTS the R&R (Doc. No. 65) in its entirety. Carson's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 18) is GRANTED. The cruel and unusual punishment claim against Carson is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Mohammadi v. Amazon.com Services LLC
3:25-cv-00088
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Amazon's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 36) but without prejudice to filing an appropriate motion, if desired, under Rule 12(c).”

Motion to amend (plaintiff) Granted

“the Court GRANTS Mohammadi's alternative request for leave to amend (Doc. No. 39).”

Harris v. SAI Nashville Motors, LLC
3:24-cv-00791
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“the pending motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 95) but WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal after the close of discovery.”

Jones v. Fowler
1:22-cv-00024
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“the Court respectfully recommends granting defendants' motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 103, 106, 109, 112).”

Keobounhom v. Tractor Supply Company
3:24-cv-00912
Motion for spoliation sanctions (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiff's motion for spoliation sanctions (Doc. No. 68) is DENIED.”

Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
3:25-cv-01064
Social security appeal (plaintiff) Denied

“the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff Pamela Robinson's motion for judgment on the administrative record (Doc. No. 9) be DENIED and the Commissioner's final disability decision be AFFIRMED.”

Coleman v. Golden
3:25-cv-00833
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 28) should be GRANTED and Coleman's amended complaint (Doc. No. 27) should be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Harpole v. Owens
3:26-cv-00556
Motion for service by us marshal (plaintiff) Granted

“Harpole's motion (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED.”

Kratochvil v. Strada
3:24-cv-01042
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim (Doc. No. 23) be DENIED.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Evans took the bench in early 2026. He issues recommendations on referred dispositive motions, decides consent Social Security appeals, and manages removed civil cases. His directly assigned cases were filed in 2026 and remain pending, so duration data is not yet available.

Put Judge Evans's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Evans actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Evans's own signed orders and cites them.