Charles Dickens Clark

How Judge Clark rules, drawn from 30 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Clark no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1895–1908
Appointed by
Grover Cleveland (Democratic)
Commissioned
1895-01-21
Education
Burritt College, B.A. (1871); Cumberland School of Law, LL.B. (1873)
Signed orders read
30

How Judge Clark decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

When interim rate enforcement threatened to destroy a utility before final adjudication, Clark treated the practical loss of the business as central to preliminary relief.

“a denial of the injunction might, in its practical effect, amount to a denial of all relief.”

Procedural preferences

Clark favored continued administration under close safeguards where creditor protection could be achieved without removing an assignee.

“the assignee will proceed with the discharge of his duties distinctly as provided by the trust deed”

Cautions

Clark required a genuinely substantial federal issue before exercising jurisdiction over a dispute grounded in state constitutional law.

“The action must be one which really and substantially involves a federal question”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

State of Tennessee v. Quintard
· 1897-05-04
Appeal (State of Tennessee) Granted

“Reversed, and case remanded, with directions to enter decree in favor of the state”

Central Trust Co. v. East Tennessee, V. & G. Ry. Co.
· 1895-08-27
Claim for priority against mortgage (intervener James) Granted

“I hold that the destruction of consignee’s property resulted from lhe negligence of the railway company; and the judgment, in my opinion, is one for damages done to property, within the class protected by the act of 1877.”

Railroad & Telephone Cos. v. Board of Equalizers of Tennessee
· 1897-12-23

Clark examined constitutional challenges to Tennessee's assessment of railroad and telephone property, but the retained text ends before a final decree.

Swafford v. Templeton
· 1901-04-30
Demurrer to action (defendants) Granted

“The suit is accordingly dismissed, with costs.”

In re Richard
· 1900-11-01
Petition for review of referee order (party challenging the referee's report) Denied

“His report is accordingly confirmed.”

Whiteside v. Supreme Conclave Improved Order of Heptasophs
· 1897-02-04
Motion for new trial (defendant) Denied

“Motion for a new trial is consequently overruled.”

In re Douglas Coal & Coke Co.
· 1904-07-06
Petition for review of referee order (party challenging the referee's ruling) Denied

“The ruling of the referee is accordingly affirmed”

Gaines v. Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum
· 1905-11-02
Preliminary injunction (complainants) Denied

“The injunction is then denied, and the bill dismissed, at the costs of the complainants.”

Yarnell v. Felton
· 1900-06-12
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“The motion to remand is accordingly granted.”

United States v. Cole
· 1904-05-26
Government revenue claim (United States) Granted

“I conclude that the government has made a case for recovery, and judgment will go accordingly.”

In re Blumberg
· 1899-07-01
Objection to bankruptcy discharge (creditors) Denied

“The objection to the petitioner’s discharge is not, in my opinion, well taken;”

Van Orden v. Mayor of Nashville
· 1895-05-04
Demurrer to patent infringement actions (defendants) Granted

“tho first cause assigned in the original demurrer is sustained, and both suits dismissed, with costa,”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The reviewed decisions predate representative electronic case-level dockets. The profile therefore makes no claim about complete caseload mix, case duration, administrative dispositions, or motion timing.

A historical record

Judge Clark no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.