Alistair E. Newbern

How Judge Newbern rules, drawn from 11 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee
Position
Magistrate judge
Commissioned
September 1, 2016
Education
University of California, Berkeley School of Law, J.D.
Signed orders read
11

About Judge Newbern

Alistair E. Newbern served as a United States Magistrate Judge for the Middle District of Tennessee from September 2016 until January 2026. Before joining the court, she practiced appellate litigation and taught at the law schools of Vanderbilt University, the University of North Carolina, and Georgetown University. She founded Vanderbilt’s Appellate Litigation Clinic.

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Newbern decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Procedural preferences

In Hudson’s prisoner civil-rights case, after the plaintiff failed to respond to a show-cause order or a summary judgment motion, she recommended dismissal without prejudice under Rule 41(b) and treating the motion as moot.

“For these reasons, the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Hudson’s claims against CoreCivic, Dillon, Lopez, and Rosario be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and that these defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 60) be FOUND MOOT.”

In Hudson, she found that the defendants’ answer and summary judgment motion were ordinary early litigation steps, not prejudice caused by the plaintiff’s delay.

“Those steps are typical of the early stages of litigation and were not necessitated by Hudson’s delay. ... There is thus no indication that the CoreCivic Defendants wasted substantial time, money, or effort due to a lack of cooperation from Hudson.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Hudson v. City of Memphis (CoreCivic Defendants)
3:23-cv-00591
Summary judgment (defendant) Moot / procedural

“the Magistrate Judge will recommend that the Court dismiss Hudson’s remaining claims without prejudice under Rule 41(b) and find moot the CoreCivic Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.”

Waters v. Social Security Administration
3:18-cv-00448

Sua sponte recommendation of dismissal without prejudice under Rule 41(b) for a pro se Social Security plaintiff who filed a blank complaint and never amended it. Quote: 'the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that this lawsuit be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule 41(b).' This recommendation did not resolve a party motion.

Nolt v. Knowles (ZK Ranches Defendants)
3:20-cv-00962
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“a Report and Recommendation from Magistrate Judge Alistair Newbern (Doc. No. 202) recommending the Court deny the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Zachary Knowles, Lyndi Knowles, and ZK Ranches”

West v. United States Bankruptcy Court M.D. Tenn. (DOE)
3:24-cv-00067
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Magistrate Judge recommends that the United States Department of Education’s (‘DOE’) motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction (Doc. No. 25) be granted, and that this action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1).”

Burnett v. Rhoades
3:21-cv-00930
Summary judgment (defendant) Moot / procedural

“the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and that SHP, Nicole, and Matthews's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 59) be FOUND MOOT.”

Goings v. DEA
3:23-cv-00714
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Court GRANT the defendants' motions to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 28, 32) and DISMISS this action for Goings's failure to effect service of process on the defendants.”

Kremer v. Unilever, PLC
3:24-cv-01410
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Court GRANT Walgreens and Unilever's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 7)”

Judgment on the pleadings (plaintiff) Denied

“DENY Kremer's request for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 9)”

Blount v. Whole Foods Market Downtown Nashville
3:23-cv-00343
Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“Whole Foods' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 120) and Blount's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 125) be DENIED”

Summary judgment (plaintiff) Denied
Motions to strike (defendant) Moot / procedural

“Whole Foods' motion to strike (Doc. No. 154) be DENIED AS MOOT.”

Reguli v. Woodruff
3:24-cv-00694
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Helper and Stephens's second Rule 12(b) motion (Doc. No. 57) be DENIED”

Motion for reconsideration (defendant) Granted in part

“Layton and CASA's motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 59) be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART”

Motion to amend (plaintiff) Denied

“Reguli's motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc. No. 82) be DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.”

Kremer v. Webador.com
2:24-cv-00028
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that Stripe's motion to dismiss be GRANTED and Kremer's claims against Stripe be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Kremer has not effected service of process.”

Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“The Magistrate Judge recommends that Kremer's motion for injunctive relief and motion for entry of default against Webador be DENIED.”

Default judgment (plaintiff) Denied
Sutton v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
2:23-cv-00064
Judgment on the pleadings (defendant) Granted

“the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS that the Court GRANT Rubin Lublin's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 83), GRANT Bank of England's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 91), and FIND MOOT Sutton's requests for discovery (Doc. No. 93).”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 182 days (N = 1).

Newbern decides consent Social Security appeals, handles criminal-duty matters, and issues recommendations in civil cases referred by district judges. The sampled referred docket is weighted toward self-represented prisoner civil-rights cases and initial screening matters.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202500
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202300
Mar 202300
Sep 202200
Mar 202203
Sep 202101
Mar 202121
Sep 202021

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, not for Judge Newbern: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed1,1388.7 months
Closed with no court action5767.5 months
Closed before pretrial5439.4 months
Closed during or after pretrial9not reported
Closed during trial1028.1 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20251,1388.7 months
Sep 20241,2627.6 months
Sep 20231,0908.9 months
Sep 202298711 months
Sep 20211,00710.6 months
Sep 202089010.3 months
Sep 201998210.7 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Newbern with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Newbern, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Newbern's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace