Suzanne H. Bauknight

How Judge Bauknight rules, drawn from 14 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Position
bankruptcy
Commissioned
2014-11-10
Education
University of South Carolina, B.A. in international studies, magna cum laude with honors; University of South Carolina School of Law, J.D., magna cum laude
Signed orders read
14

How Judge Bauknight decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

When state property law made a survivorship interest severable and left each co-owner with a divisible share, the debtor could claim the Tennessee homestead exemption in the whole jointly owned interest.

“The Court, therefore, finds that the survivorship interest has no impact on the availability of the homestead exemption and Debtor may claim the homestead exemption in his whole interest in the jointly owned Property.”

A preference defense required tangible economic value returned to the estate; avoiding incarceration did not replenish estate assets.

“[A] vast majority of courts agree that 'new value' for purposes of § 547 must be something of tangible economic value.”

Procedural preferences

Repeated boilerplate discovery objections, delayed privilege logs, and hearings made necessary by incomplete responses supported both compelled supplementation and an expense award.

“The Court finding that the Amended Motion is well taken in most respects, UpRight Law must amend its responses to the Chapter 13 Trustee’s discovery requests as detailed herein.”

Cautions

For Tennessee entireties property in an individual bankruptcy, a lien on the estate's survivorship interest is not avoidable through a homestead exemption that does not reach that interest.

“Because only Debtor’s survivorship interest in the Residence is property of the estate, and the homestead exemption does not apply to that survivorship interest under Sixth Circuit and Tennessee law, the Court, accordingly, directs the following:”

Plan projections need evidentiary support for refinancing and operating assumptions; unsupported forecasts did not establish feasibility even where the proposed secured-creditor treatment was not inherently unfair.

“Because Debtor’s figures do not support a finding that the Second Amended Plan can be funded as proposed and is not likely to be followed by liquidation or the need for additional financial restructuring, confirmation will be denied based upon feasibility.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Adam Wade Campbell
3:25-bk-32010-SHB · 2026-05-11
Motion to avoid judicial lien (Adam Wade Campbell) Denied

“The Amended Motion to Avoid Judicial Lien Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1)(A) filed by Debtor on May 4, 2026 [Doc. 47], seeking to avoid the lien of ABC Supply Co. Inc. is DENIED.”

Motion to avoid judicial lien (Adam Wade Campbell) Denied

“The Amended Motion to Avoid Judicial Lien Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1)(A) filed by Debtor on May 4, 2026 [Doc. 48], seeking to avoid the lien of Builders FirstSource, Inc. is DENIED.”

In re Roos
· 2018-09-14
Objection to exemption (Ann Mostoller, Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“For these reasons, the Objection to Exemption is overruled, and Debtor's $25,000.00 homestead exemption shall be *810allowed.”

Farmer v. Citizens National Bank (In re Davis)
· 2015-03-30
Judgment on the pleadings (Citizens National Bank) Granted

“the court grants Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings”

Summary judgment (John P. Newton Jr., Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“and denies Plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment.”

Kloeber v. Montanari (In re Montanari)
· 2015-10-29
Motion to enforce settlement (Karl-Heinz Kloeber) Granted

“Because Defendants have failed to execute a document memorializing this binding settlement agreement, the Court will enter, a judgment to enforce the agreement.”

Request for attorney fees and expenses (Karl-Heinz Kloeber) Granted

“they will be required to pay the reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred by Plaintiff to file and prosecute the Motion to Enforce.”

Request for joint and several fee liability (Karl-Heinz Kloeber) Denied

“The Court, however, finds no basis whatever for imposing joint and' several liability for such attorneys’ fees and expenses on Defendants’ counsel, and Plaintiffs request for such is denied.”

In re Trammell
· 2018-03-19
Motion for relief from automatic stay (United States of America on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service) Granted

“The Court, having analyzed both sides' arguments, finds that the 2016 Levy is a continuing levy against the MLB disability pension benefits and that the IRS is entitled to retroactive stay relief and annulment of the stay”

In re Adams
· 2016-04-25
Objection to exemption (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“For these reasons, the Trustee’s Objection to Exemption shall be sustained”

In re D & H Machine Service, Inc.
· 2016-09-09
Application for compensation and expenses (Hodges, Doughty & Carson, PLLC) Granted in part

“the Court determines that the Amended Application shall be granted in part, and [¶] & C shall be allowed fees in the amount of $18,334.00 and expenses in the amount of $785.83.”

Newton v. Fabrication (In re Davis)
3:17-ap-03007-SHB · 2018-02-01
Summary judgment (Metal Craft Fabrication and Sales, LLC) Denied

“Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment will be denied”

Summary judgment (John P. Newton Jr., Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“and Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment will be granted.”

In re Tellico Lake Properties, L.P.
· 2016-03-30
Motion for turnover (John P. Newton Jr., Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“the Trustee is entitled to turnover of the cars. Wolfenbarger shall be required to turn over possession of the Antique Cars to the Trustee within thirty days.”

Gray v. Vinsant (In re Vinsant)
· 2015-10-07
Summary judgment (Danny Gray and Peggy Gray) Denied

“Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.”

In re Kennedy
· 2016-06-02
Objection to exemption (John P. Newton Jr., Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“the Court sustains the Trustee’s objection to Debtor’s amended exemptions seeking to exempt the Annuity payments beyond the $8,340.00 stipulated exemption amount”

Objection to sale (Debtor) Denied

“and overrules Debtor’s objection to the Trustee’s proposed sale of future Annuity payments”

In re Shivshankar Partnership LLC
· 2015-03-06
Objection to plan confirmation (Tennessee State Bank) Granted

“The Objections to Confirmation filed by Tennessee State Bank and the United States Trustee shall be sustained”

Objection to plan confirmation (United States Trustee) Granted
Request for plan confirmation (Shivshankar Partnership LLC) Denied

“Debtor’s Second Amended Plan filed on October 30, 2014, is not feasible and cannot be confirmed as proposed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

All six sampled matters were terminated. Campbell supplied two text-grounded contested-motion dispositions; the five early streams supplied filing labels without attributable disposition text.

Draft for Judge Bauknight with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Bauknight, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Bauknight's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace