John C. Cook

How Judge Cook rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Cook no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee
Position
bankruptcy
Status
Retired 2015
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Cook decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Fraud-based nondischargeability can be established when use of a financing instrument implies an intent to comply with essential conditions and the evidence shows the borrower intended otherwise at the time of use.

“An intent not to comply with the conditions of usage, evident at the time of the usage, would amount to a misrepresentation”

Procedural preferences

A secured creditor may amend a timely claim to state a post-foreclosure deficiency when the amendment arises from the same transaction and reaches the trustee before distribution.

“the trustee became aware of these amended claims before any distribution was made”

A confirmed plan should state secured treatment clearly; an incorrect but specific valuation can bind, while internally contradictory nominal treatment may not.

“an incorrect valuation is still a specific valuation”

Cautions

Communications directed only to the debtor do not substitute for a timely proof of claim or another filing directed to the court or estate representative.

“debtor's knowledge of the claim has never been held sufficient to constitute an informal proof of claim”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Huggins
· 2011-11-10
Objection to motion to compromise (Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison, P.C. and John P. Konvalinka) Denied

“Because neither Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison nor John Konvalinka is a party in interest with standing to object to the trustee’s proposed settlement, the court will overrule their objections”

Request for permissive intervention (Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison, P.C. and John P. Konvalinka) Denied

“the court would exercise its discretion to deny such a motion for the same reasons that it holds the law firm and Mr. Konvalinka to lack standing to oppose the compromise and settlement.”

Jahn v. Bedford Consulting Group, LLC (In re U.S. Insurance Group, LLC)
· 2010-09-09
Motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) Granted

“Accordingly, an order will enter granting the FDIC’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction against that defendant.”

Jahn v. Genesis Merchant Partners, LP (In re U.S. Insurance Group, LLC)
· 2011-06-09
Motion for summary judgment on preference claim (Richard P. Jahn Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee) Granted

“Having reviewed the motions, briefs, affidavits, and other related filings, the court will grant the plaintiff's motion.”

In re Senior Housing Alternatives, Inc.
· 2011-01-19
Motion to determine postpetition income is cash collateral (Senior Housing Alternatives, Inc.) Granted

“the court concludes, for the reasons that follow, that the postpetition cash generated from the debtor’s business does constitute cash collateral”

Jahn v. United States (In re Winpar Hospitality Chattanooga, LLC)
· 2009-02-06
Motion for partial summary judgment on stay violation (Richard P. Jahn Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee) Denied

“The trustee’s motion for partial summary judgment will therefore be denied because he cannot prove a violation of the stay.”

Motion for summary judgment on stay violation (United States) Granted

“The United States’ motion for summary judgment will be granted insofar as it requests dismissal of the complaint initiating this adversary proceeding.”

Coffey v. Coffey (In re Coffey)
· 2006-08-21
Motion for summary judgment on discharge effect (The plaintiff) Denied

“the court will deny both motions and dismiss this proceeding without prejudice.”

Motion for summary judgment on discharge effect (The defendant) Denied
Capital One Auto Finance v. Viva (In re Viva)
· 2008-09-18
Adversary complaint to determine debt nondischargeable (Capital One Auto Finance) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, the court will enter a separate judgment for the plaintiff.”

In re Spurling
· 2008-06-12
Objection to trustees final report (Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation) Granted

“the court will enter an order sustaining Caterpillar Financial Service Corporation’s objection to the trustee’s final report”

Objection to amended deficiency claim (Chapter 7 trustee as to Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation) Denied

“overruling the trustee’s objections to the claims of Caterpillar, Jose Rocha, Efrain Lara, and Aztec Framing Contractors, Inc.”

Objection to amended deficiency claim (Chapter 7 trustee as to Jose Rocha) Denied
Objection to amended deficiency claim (Chapter 7 trustee as to Efrain Lara) Denied
Objection to amended deficiency claim (Chapter 7 trustee as to Aztec Framing Contractors, Inc.) Denied
Jahn v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. (In re Transcommunications Inc.)
· 2006-12-04
Adversary complaint to recover setoffs (Richard P. Jahn Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee) Granted in part

“the defendant, U.S. Xpress Enterprises, Inc., may retain its recoupment of $148,081.24. The trustee is entitled to recover the sum of $86,722.60”

Jahn v. United States (In re Winpar Hospitality Chattanooga, LLC)
· 2009-04-13
Motion to alter or amend judgment (Richard P. Jahn Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee) Denied

“the trustee’s motion to alter or amend the order dismissing the adversary proceeding against the United States will be denied.”

Motion for turnover (United States) Granted

“the government’s motion for turnover will be treated as an application to relinquish this court’s jurisdiction over the res to the District Court for the Middle District of Florida, and the court will grant the application.”

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Propex Inc. v. BNP Paribas (In re Propex Inc.)
· 2009-03-05
Motion to dismiss adversary counts (BNP Paribas) Granted in part

“an order will enter an order granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts I, III, IV, and V of the complaint but denying the motion to dismiss Count VI.”

Demerdjian v. Thompson (In re Thompson)
· 2006-11-01
Adversary complaint to determine debt nondischargeable (Armen Joel Demerdjian) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, the court will enter a separate order and judgment dismissing the plaintiffs complaint.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

All five sampled matters were terminated; their retained docket streams were empty.

A historical record

Judge Cook no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.