Irvin N. Hoyt

How Judge Hoyt rules, drawn from 20 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Hoyt no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Dakota
Position
bankruptcy
Status
No longer serving
Signed orders read
20

How Judge Hoyt decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

For Chapter 11 feasibility, the court required projections grounded in objective facts.

“A showing of feasibility must be ‘rooted in predictions based on objective fact.’”

Procedural preferences

The court recognized continued post-confirmation assistance when it benefited plan administration and helped debtors respond to later questions.

“Moreover, the Court wants to encourage debtors’ counsel not to abandon their debtors when creditors or the case trustee have questions and concerns during the course of the plan.”

Cautions

Failure to disclose a material professional relationship was independently sufficient to deny all compensation.

“Lynn, Jackson’s failure to disclose its relationship with Fidelity is sufficient cause to deny all compensation.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Tri-State Ethanol Co. LLC
· 2006-11-13
Secured claim for prepayment charge (First Dakota National Bank) Granted in part

“As discussed below, First Dakota National Bank’s motion will be denied under § 506(b); however, the prepayment charge will be allowed as a component of its secured claim against Debtor under 11 U.S.C. § 502(b).”

In re Tri-State Ethanol Co. LLC
· 2007-06-19
Motion to approve compromise (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“As set forth below, the motion will be granted.”

In re Davis
· 1999-01-13
Objection to claimed exemptions (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“As set forth below, the Court concludes that the Trustee’s objection must be sustained and that Debtor is not a head of family under S.D.C.L. § 43-45-4.”

In re Teigen
· 1998-12-18
Objection to claim (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“Trustee Pfeiffer shall then prepare appropriate orders sustaining his objections to the Duininck Brothers’ and United Fire’s claims as provided herein.”

Objection to claim (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted
In re Hughes
· 1999-10-18
Objection to homestead exemption (Chapter 7 trustee) Granted

“As set forth below, the Court will sustain the Trustee’s objection.”

In re May
· 1996-03-22
Plan confirmation (debtors) Denied

“An Order will be entered denying confirmation of Debtor’s plan dated September 13, *859 1995 and setting a deadline for filing a modified plan.”

Sentinel Federal Credit Union v. United States ex rel. Rural Economic & Community Development (In re Tunnissen)
· 1996-03-04
Summary judgment (Farm Service Agency) Granted

“FSA’s Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted by separate order.”

In re Wax
· 1992-11-03
Objection to claimed exemptions (Chapter 7 trustee) Denied

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Chapter 7 Trustee John S. Lovald’s Objections to Claimed Exemptions filed February 6, 1992 is OVERRULED.”

In re Brandenburger
· 1992-07-17
Application for compensation and reimbursement (debtors' counsel) Granted in part

“Total allowed compensation and reimbursement from the Brandenbur-ger estate pursuant to this application is $1,169.03, less the $800.00 retainer already received, for a total amount due of $369.03.”

Application for compensation and reimbursement (debtors' counsel) Granted in part

“These conclusions calculate to allowed expenses of $149.36 5 ; compensation for 7.1 hours of services by J. Bruce Blake at $80.00 per hour for $568.00; compensation for 4 hours of services by Joyce P. Gall for $160.00; and sales tax of $43.68 for a total award from the estate of $921.04.”

In re Gerth
· 1991-10-25
Motion for modification of stay and setoff (Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service) Denied

“An order will be entered denying the Motion for Modification of Automatic Stay and for Setoff filed by the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service.”

In re Utne
· 1992-10-05
Motion to dismiss bankruptcy case (Farmers Home Administration) Granted

“Debtor’s Chapter 12 case must be dismissed because *250 his successive petition and proposed plan of reorganization were not filed in good faith. An order will be entered dismissing the case.”

In re Reinbold
· 1990-02-05
Motion for relief from stay (Dewey County Bank) Granted

“Realizing that justice delayed is justice denied, the Court will grant DCB’s motion for relief from the automatic stay in order to expedite the recovery of its collateral.”

Motion to convert to chapter 7 (Dewey County Bank) Granted

“DCB’s motion to convert Reinbold’s case to one under Chapter 7 will also be granted.”

Request for rule 9011 terms (Dewey County Bank) Denied

“DCB’s request for terms under Rule 9011 will be denied.”

Request for restraining order (Dewey County Bank) Denied

“DCB’s request for a restraining order relative to the debtor’s collateral will be denied, as such would be more properly considered by the state court.”

A historical record

Judge Hoyt no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.