Terry L. Wooten
How Judge Wooten rules, drawn from 5 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
How Judge Wooten decides
Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
What persuades
Denies summary judgment in securities-fraud actions where forward-looking statements were paired with undisclosed adverse facts and the plaintiff's loss-causation expert offers an admissible event study, letting the case reach a jury; also declines to exclude the competing experts at that stage.
“For the reasons set forth herein, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. (Doc. # 108).”
Procedural preferences
In First Amendment challenges to adult-business zoning and licensing, applies the secondary-effects framework, defers heavily to a city's legislative record, and upholds ordinances as content-neutral time/place/manner regulations.
“Before the Court are the City's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 25, and Taboo's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 38. The Court grants the City's motion and denies Taboo's motion.”
Cautions
Construes insurance coverage exclusions strictly against the insurer and reads policy terms like 'incident that could result in a claim' narrowly, refusing to rescind claims-made policies where no disclosable matter existed on the application.
“Thus, after careful consideration, for the reasons stated herein, IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 22) is hereby DENIED.”
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“For the reasons set forth herein, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. (Doc. # 108).”
“Defendants' motion to exclude the opinions and testimony of John D. Finnerty, Ph.D. is DENIED. (Doc. # 105).”
“Plaintiffs motions to exclude the testimony of John P. Freeman and the testimony of Christopher F. Noe, Ph.D., as set forth, are DENIED. (Docs. # 109 and 110).”
“Thus, after careful consideration, for the reasons stated herein, IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 22) is hereby DENIED.”
“Before the Court are the City's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 25, and Taboo's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 38. The Court grants the City's motion and denies Taboo's motion.”
“This matter comes before the Court for consideration of the pro se petition to vacate, set aside, or correct a sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 filed by Petitioner Johnny Cade. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the petition.”
“Accordingly, his petition for relief pursuant to § 2255, ECF No. 78, is GRANTED. His sentence in this case is hereby VACATED.”
Draft for Judge Wooten with the record in hand
Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Wooten, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Grounded in Judge Wooten's own signed orders
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace