Richard Mark Gergel

How Judge Gergel rules, drawn from 7 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina
Position
district
Appointed by
Barack Obama (Democratic)
Commissioned
2010-08-09
Education
Duke University (B.A. 1975); Duke University School of Law (J.D. 1979)
Signed orders read
7

How Judge Gergel decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Applies the FLSA tip-credit and willfulness standards strictly against employers: deducting bar-shortage losses from tipped employees' wages while claiming a tip credit violates the FLSA as a matter of law, and continuing the practice after suit supports willfulness and liquidated damages.

“For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 41) is GRANTED.”

Procedural preferences

Will convert a Rule 12(b) motion that relies on matters outside the pleadings into a Rule 56 motion under Rule 12(d) and resolve limitations and discovery-rule questions at summary judgment where the notice facts are uncontroverted.

“the Court construes the motion to dismiss as a motion for summary judgment and GRANTS the motion for summary judgment. ... The claims against Defendants Awuko Abrasives Wandmacher GmbH & Co KG and Wandmacher GmbH are dismissed with prejudice.”

Construes removal jurisdiction strictly and rejects pre-service removal when it would turn the forum-defendant rule into a race to federal court.

“if the forum-defendant rule were read to allow pre-service removal, it would provide an incentive for defendants to employ gamesmanship by racing to remove newly filed actions”

Cautions

On first-party insurance bad-faith claims he grants the insurer summary judgment where it had a reasonable ground to contest valuation; a wrong-but-reasonable settlement prediction is not bad faith.

“Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 40) is GRANTED.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Henry v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
· 2017-08-03
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 40) is GRANTED.”

Motion to certify question (plaintiff) Denied

“Plaintiffs Motion to Certify Questions (Dkt. No. 41) is DENIED.”

Sellers v. Keller Unlimited LLC
· 2019-06-28
Summary judgment (plaintiff) Granted

“For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 41) is GRANTED.”

Newkirk v. Enzor
2:13-cv-01634-RMG · 2017-03-08
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“the Court declines, grants in part and denies in part Mr. Enzor's motion for summary judgment, and denies SCDPS's motion for summary judgment.”

Summary judgment (defendant) Denied

“and denies SCDPS's motion for summary judgment.”

Abrasives-South, Inc. v. AWUKO Abrasives Wandmacher GmbH & Co. KG
· 2016-08-17
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“the Court construes the motion to dismiss as a motion for summary judgment and GRANTS the motion for summary judgment. ... The claims against Defendants Awuko Abrasives Wandmacher GmbH & Co KG and Wandmacher GmbH are dismissed with prejudice.”

Kickin' Chicken, LLC v. TFD, Inc.
9:22-cv-00013 · 2022-03-04
Motions to remand (plaintiff) Granted

“For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff’s motion to remand (Dkt. No. 11) is GRANTED. The Court REMANDS the action to the Court of Common Pleas for Jasper County, South Carolina for adjudication on the merits.”

Motions to stay (plaintiff) Moot / procedural

“The Court REMANDS the action to the Court of Common Pleas for Jasper County, South Carolina for adjudication on the merits. All other pending motions are denied as moot.”

Motion for leave to file surreply (defendant) Denied

“The Court denies TFD’s motion for leave to file a sur-reply for various reasons.”

Williams v. Ameris Bank ISAOA
2:24-cv-04068 · 2024-09-24
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“In light of the foregoing, the Court GRANTS Defendant Selective's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' claims for declaratory relief. (Dkt. No. 7).”

Newberry v. Cofty
1:24-cv-04062 · 2024-11-07
Preliminary injunction (plaintiff) Denied

“The Court ADOPTS the R & R (Dkt. No. 27) as the Order of the Court, DENIES Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, and DISMISSES this action without further leave to amend.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 470 days (N = 8).

The sampled docket spans civil-rights and habeas cases, Social Security appeals, insurance and contract disputes, product-liability and medical-malpractice cases, employment claims, consumer-credit cases, and federal criminal matters. It also includes the national firefighting-foam multidistrict litigation and the Jose Padilla enemy-combatant damages case, Lebron v. Rumsfeld.

Draft for Judge Gergel with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Gergel, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Gergel's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace