James Robert Martin Jr.

How Judge Martin rules, drawn from 17 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Martin no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1961–1984
Appointed by
John F. Kennedy (Democratic)
Commissioned
1961-09-18
Education
Washington and Lee University School of Law, LL.B. (1931)
Signed orders read
17

How Judge Martin decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Brown, Martin treated equal access to state recreational facilities as constitutionally mandatory despite anticipated public resistance.

“There can be no racial discrimination in the operation of State owned or operated recreational facilities.”

Procedural preferences

In Central South Carolina Chapter, Martin emphasized trial-court control over jury administration when evaluating press-access objections to a fair-trial order.

“The management of the jury is a function solely within the authority of the trial court”

Cautions

In Sabel, Martin cautioned that marketplace success did not by itself establish patentable invention.

“commercial success alone does not make invention.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Brown v. South Carolina State Forestry Commission
· 1963-07-10
Summary judgment motion (plaintiffs) Granted

“The plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure must be granted.”

Motion to join additional parties (intervenor) Denied

“His motions to bring in additional parties and to file a counterclaim are hereby denied.”

Motion for leave to file counterclaim (intervenor) Denied
United States v. Campbell
· 1967-05-09
Motion to suppress (defendant) Denied

“It is ordered that the motion to suppress is hereby denied.”

Sabel v. Wickes Corp.
· 1971-12-31
Declaratory judgment claim (declaratory-judgment plaintiff) Granted

“It is the decision of this Court that the Sabel patent fails to meet the statutory requirements under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as to nonobviousness and is therefore invalid.”

Stanley v. Darlington County School District
· 1970-03-03
Motion for permanent injunction (United States) Granted

“It is ordered that Jeryl Best, L. Del-mus Kirven, Tommy Skinner, John Weber, C. W. Windham, Mac Windham and Travis Barnes are permanently enjoined and restrained from interfering or committing any acts which have the effect of interfering with, the operation of the Darlington County Schools, or committing any other act individually, directly or indirectly, which has the effect of interference with operation of said schools.”

United States v. Welch
· 1973-07-25
Motion for new trial (defendant) Denied

“It is ordered that the motion for a new trial is denied.”

Calhoun v. Washington Investors Plans, Inc.
· 1967-04-26
Summary judgment motion (defendants) Granted

“It is ordered that the motions for summary judgment of all of the defendants be granted, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied and judgment be entered in favor of the defendants.”

Summary judgment motion (plaintiff) Denied
United States v. One 1965 Pontiac Catalina Sport Coupe
· 1967-01-19
Application for remission (claimant) Denied

“It is ordered that the application for remission is denied and all costs and expenses of this proceeding are to be paid by the claimant, General Motors Acceptance Corporation.”

United States ex rel. Clark v. All Star Triangle Bowl, Inc.
· 1968-02-23
Motion for permanent injunction (United States) Granted

“It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendants Harry K. Floyd, Carolyn R. Floyd, E. C. Floyd and Hanna Floyd, and the defendant All Star Triangle Bowl, Inc., its respective officers, agents, representatives, employees and successors and all other persons in active concert or participation with them are hereby restrained and enjoined from engaging in any act or practice in the operation of All Star Bowling which directly denies any person the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages and accommodations of All Star Bowling on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.”

Finger v. United States
· 1966-05-18
Summary judgment motion (defendant) Granted

“It is ordered that the motion of defendant for summary judgment is granted; that plaintiffs’ complaint is hereby dismissed; that judgment is awarded to the United States of America together with its cost of this action.”

Hall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
· 1966-10-26
Declaratory judgment claim (plaintiffs) Granted

“(2) State Farm is liable as insurer under its liability policy with Fleming to pay to Plaintiffs as damages the amounts •of the judgments secured by Plaintiffs .against Fleming.”

Harris v. Marion Concrete Co.
· 1970-03-27
Money judgment claim (plaintiffs) Granted

“(1) In the case of R. J. Harris, C.A. #68-764, judgment for plaintiff for $30,000.00 against the defendants, and tax costs against defendants; (2) In the case of Cleve G. Harris, C. A. #68-765, judgment for plaintiff for $2500.00 against the defendants, and tax costs against the defendants; (3) In the case of Wayne F. Brown, C.A. #68-865, judgment for plaintiff for $1250.00 against the defendants, and tax costs against defendants; and,”

Counterclaim (defendant) Denied

“(4) In the case of Cleve G. Harris, C. A. #68-765, judgment for plaintiff, Cleve G. Harris, on the counterclaim of defendant, Marion Concrete Company, Inc.”

Isaac v. United States
· 1968-07-30
Section 2255 petition (Laverne Isaac) Granted

“It is therefore ordered that the conviction and sentence as to Laverne Isaac be vacated, the charge in the indictment be dismissed and that he be discharged.”

Section 2255 petition (Charles Whitted Leavell) Granted

“It is further ordered that the conviction and sentence as to Charles Whitted Leavell which involves Count 1 of the indictment be set aside, that his conviction and sentence which involves Count 7 of the indictment be vacated and the charge contained in that count be dismissed.”

Section 2255 petition (Jack Simmons Horger) Granted in part

“It is further ordered that the conviction and sentence of Jack Simmons Horger which involves Count 1 of the indictment be set aside, that his conviction and sentence as to Counts 2, 4 and 7 of the indictment be vacated and the charges contained in Counts 2, 4 and 7 be dismissed. The conviction and sentence of Horger as to Counts 3, 5 and 6 is hereby affirmed.”

Motion for reduction of sentence (Charles Whitted Leavell) Moot / procedural

“Since Leavell’s sentence as to Count 1 has been set aside and his sentence as to Count 7 vacated, the alternative motion for reduction of sentence is moot.”

Motion for reduction of sentence (Jack Simmons Horger) Denied

“As to Horger’s motion for reduction of sentence, no matter has been presented to the Court which would justify granting the motions and it is therefore denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No exact-name historical dockets were available for a caseload sample.

A historical record

Judge Martin no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.