Henry Augustus Middleton Smith

How Judge Smith rules, drawn from 9 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Smith no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1911–1924
Appointed by
William Howard Taft
Commissioned
1911-06-07
Education
College of Charleston, B.A. (1872); Read law (1874)
Signed orders read
9

How Judge Smith decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Willis, Smith protected a good-faith purchaser who paid value while the intermediate buyer remained solvent.

“although this seller’s lien exists between seller and purchaser, it does not exist, or rather it is not revived, to the detriment of innocent third purchasers for value”

Procedural preferences

In Acker, Smith followed an established local cost-taxation practice absent a reason to depart from it.

“That decision settled the practice in this court at the time, and I see no reason for not holding it to control the present case.”

Cautions

In The Ester, Smith treated treaty obligations and international comity as reasons not to assume inadequate foreign relief.

“under the rule of comity this court should not assume that the libelant will not receive entire justice from the Kingdom of Sweden”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

The Ester
· 1911-07-31
Maritime wage and injury libel (foreign seaman) Denied

“A decree will be entered dismissing the libel”

Acker v. Charleston & W. C. Ry. Co.
· 1911-09-12
Appeal from cost taxation (party challenging costs) Denied

“the docket fee of $10 allowed by the clerk in his taxation be approved.”

Broad River Lumber Co. v. Middleby
· 1912-02-07
Appeal from decree (lumber company) Granted in part

“The decree of tlie court below, therefore, must be modified so as to accord with this conclusion.”

Ætna Line Ins. Co., of Hartford v. Outlaw
· 1912-02-14
Appellate challenge to judgment (insurance company) Denied

“the judgment below must be accordingly affirmed.”

Spring Garden Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. Wood
· 1912-02-14
Appellate challenge to judgment (insurance company) Granted

“the judgment below must be reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial in accordance with this decision.”

Brown v. Foster
· 1912-02-14
Appellate challenge to equitable relief (tax collector) Granted

“his judgment must be reversed.”

In re Jenkins
· 1912-01-09
Contractual attorney fee claim (First National Bank of Sharon) Denied

“the First National Bank of Sharon is not entitled to have this additional 10 per cent, either paid out of the proceeds of the mortgaged property, or to prove for it against the general estate of the bankrupt”

Carolina Glass Co. v. Murray
· 1912-06-19
Action against state officer (Carolina Glass Company) Denied

“this adjudication is limited to one of dismissal on that ground”

Willis v. Glenwood Cotton Mills
· 1912-11-23
Replevin claim (Grinnell Willis & Co.) Granted

“the plaintiffs, Grinnell Willis & Co., entitled to recover from the defendant Glen-wood Cotton Mills the 52 bales of cotton goods in dispute”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No case-level docket records were located for this judge, so no caseload mix or duration estimate is reported.

A historical record

Judge Smith no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.