Charles Earl Simons Jr.

How Judge Simons rules, drawn from 23 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Simons no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina
Position
district
Status
Deceased
Served
1964–1999
Appointed by
Lyndon B. Johnson
Commissioned
1964-05-01
Education
University of South Carolina, A.B. (1937); University of South Carolina School of Law, LL.B. (1939)
Signed orders read
23

How Judge Simons decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In Mauldin, Simons treated the absence of transferable skills and realistic retraining or employment prospects as decisive in disability review.

“the prospect for retraining and employment are non-existent. She has no transferrable skills.”

Procedural preferences

In Grayson, Simons declined summary judgment where policy language and extrinsic evidence required a fuller factual record.

“summary judgment is not the answer. The court will be in a much better position to determine the question at issue after a trial of the case on the merits rather than at this stage.”

Cautions

In Nolen, Simons treated the anti-injunction statute as barring interference even though parallel cases created a race to judgment.

“The result is a race to judgment, with which this court, under the anti-injunction statute and the within authorities, holds itself powerless to interfere.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Barton v. Griffith
· 1966-05-10
Motion for new trial (plaintiff) Denied

“The plaintiff’s alternative motions for new trial are, therefore, overruled.”

Parker v. Gardner
· 1966-07-15
Social security appeal (claimant) Denied

“The decision of the Secretary is therefore affirmed”

Mauldin v. Celebrezze
· 1966-11-10
Social security appeal (claimant) Granted

“It must, therefore, be reversed.”

Mauldin v. Gardner
· 1967-02-28
Attorney fee petition (claimant’s attorney) Granted

“a fee of $1,325.50 representing one-fourth of the past due benefits to which claimant is now entitled is a reasonable and just fee”

United States v. First Carolina Fund
· 1967-12-06
Summary judgment motion (United States) Granted

“the Clerk is hereby directed to enter judgment for said amount”

Appointment of receiver (United States) Granted

“Robert A. Clay, Esquire, be and he hereby is appointed receiver”

Mickel v. South Carolina State Employment Service
· 1968-02-22
Summary judgment motion (South Carolina State Employment Service) Granted

“Summary Judgment be granted to the defendant, South Carolina State Employment Service, and that this action be dismissed.”

Grayson v. Aetna Insurance
· 1968-11-01
Summary judgment motion (plaintiff) Denied

“both plaintiff’s and defendant’s motions for summary judgment are denied.”

Summary judgment motion (defendant) Denied
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Beard
· 1968-12-05
Motion to join required party (defendant) Granted

“Ford Motor Company be joined as a party defendant under the provisions of Rule 19 (a)”

Third party complaint (third-party plaintiff) Denied

“the third party proceedings heretofore filed herein be dismissed.”

Crawford v. Cohen
· 1969-01-08
Social security appeal (claimant) Denied

“the Secretary’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, and it is accordingly affirmed.”

United States ex rel. Erie City Iron Works v. Fullerton Construction Co.
· 1969-04-30
Summary judgment motion (defendants) Granted

“defendants’ motion for summary judgment in their behalf should be granted.”

Becote v. South Carolina State Highway Department
· 1970-02-16
Motions to dismiss (state highway department) Granted

“defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is hereby granted.”

Driggers v. United States
· 1970-03-13
Motions to dismiss (United States) Granted

“the actions must be dismissed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median case duration in the sampled dockets: 1282 days (N = 5).

The fixed five-docket sample consisted of terminated cases filed from 1976 through 1978, but no nature-of-suit values or electronic entry timelines were available.

A historical record

Judge Simons no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.