Raymond James Pettine

U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island district Appointed by Lyndon B. Johnson (Democratic) 21 signed orders read

How Judge Pettine decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Pettine treated contemporaneous witness statements as discoverable when later recollection could not supply an equivalent and the material did not reveal counsel's impressions.

“These statements are ones which could not in all probability now be obtained from the named witnesses because their present memories would hardly be as acute as their memories shortly after the accident.”

He granted administrative review where the agency's dormancy analysis lacked a sufficient record-based justification.

“It is hereby ordered that the Interstate Commerce Commission’s decision and order dated July 1, 1968, be vacated”

Procedural preferences

Pettine enforced Rule 12's anti-piecemeal design and would not permit a defense omitted from an earlier consolidated motion to be raised later.

“To permit this defense to be raised now would undermine the very purpose of Rule 12(g), (h), which is the avoidance of time-consuming, piece-meal litigation of pre-trial motions.”

He separated venue convenience from case management, denying transfer while granting a stay to reduce duplicative proceedings.

“Sauquoit’s motion to stay, pending the outcome of the litigation in the Eastern District of New York, and/or the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, is hereby granted”

Cautions

Pettine required specific prejudice before dismissing an indictment for the grand jury's receipt of hearsay evidence.

“have not been able to point to any specific harm caused by the use of hearsay.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Scherza v. Home Indemnity Co.
· 1966-08-22
Motion to assert counterclaim (defendant insurer) Denied

“The defendant’s motion is denied.”

Rajotte v. Home Indemnity Co.
· 1966-09-22
Motions to dismiss (defendant insurer) Granted

“The Motion to Dismiss is hereby granted without prejudice with leave to amend the complaint.”

Wirtz v. Local Union No. 57, 57-A, 57-B, & 57-C, International Union of Operating Engineers
· 1968-11-12
Motions to dismiss (defendant union) Denied

“The motion to dismiss is denied.”

United States v. Edward R. Marden Corp.
· 1968-12-02
Motion to dismiss third party complaint (third-party defendant) Denied

“For these reasons, the third-party defendant’s motion to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds is denied.”

Tiernan v. Westext Transport, Inc.
· 1969-02-06
Motion to consolidate (litigants in related accident cases) Granted

“the cases are ordered to be consolidated and C.A. Nos. 3449 and 3471 are deemed the cases to be tried.”

Tiernan v. Westext Transport, Inc.
· 1969-02-06
Motion to produce witness statements (plaintiff administrator) Granted

“the court orders the parties to establish a mutually satisfactory time and place for the production and copying of all the requested statements.”

Tiernan v. Dunn
· 1969-02-06
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is denied.”

McLaughlin v. Stevens
· 1969-02-13
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“For all the above reasons, the motion for summary judgment is granted.”

Arrow Transportation Co. v. United States
· 1969-06-17
Agency order review (applicant carriers) Granted

“It is hereby ordered that the Interstate Commerce Commission’s decision and order dated July 1, 1968, be vacated and that this ease be remanded to the Commission for such further proceedings as are required”

United States v. Gramolini
· 1969-06-17
Motion to dismiss indictment (defendants) Denied

“The motions to dismiss in this regard are denied.”

In re Naturalization of Ladrido
· 1969-11-10
Naturalization petition (petitioner) Granted

“It is, therefore, ordered that the petition for naturalization be and the same hereby is granted.”

Forsythe v. Cohen
· 1969-11-10
Motions to dismiss (defendants) Denied

“The defendants’ motion to dismiss is hereby denied.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The twenty located assigned dockets span contract, Social Security, civil-rights, product-liability, constitutional, forfeiture, environmental, labor, condemnation, maritime-contract, and railroad-injury matters. The five randomly checked cases were all terminated and retained no entry timeline.

Put Judge Pettine's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Pettine actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Pettine's own signed orders and cites them.