Jonathan Russell Bullock
How Judge Bullock decides
Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.
What persuades
Bullock required the assignee to establish the timing and unusual character of a transfer before invoking a presumption of fraud against the purchaser.
“But upon an issue of title, between the assignee and vendee, it would be first incumbent upon the former to show a sale, and within the time limited, and its unusual character, before the presumption of fraud would arise against the vendee.”
The absence of urgency or a demonstrated risk of irretrievable loss weighed against changing possession through a summary order before the title dispute was adjudicated.
“With this remedy prescribed, and in a case where no haste is required, where no risk of irretrievable loss is shown or suggested, to change the custody of this property by summary order upon mere motion would be almost to create rather than administer a remedial process.”
Procedural preferences
Bullock described summary bankruptcy authority as judicial discretion bounded by the rights of all parties and established procedure.
“This discretion, however, is not a wanton power. It is not a power to order this or that summarily and upon motion, because it may.”
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“For these reasons the motion in this case is overruled.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
No case-level electronic docket record survives in the reviewed archive for Bullock's tenure, so no caseload mix, duration, or motion-timing summary is available.
Put Judge Bullock's record to work
Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Bullock actually rules, not a generic AI guess.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Bullock's own signed orders and cites them.