John Christopher Mahoney

U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island district Appointed by Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic) 20 signed orders read

How Judge Mahoney decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Mahoney treated an actually paid liability as the practical point at which a cash-basis taxpayer's loss became deductible.

“the. customer sustained the loss when the certainty of loss was definitely ascertained and when the indebtedness was actually paid.”

In patent cases, he required an enabling description and would not allow marketplace success to rescue an otherwise invalid specification.

“The emphasis placed upon the commercial success of the alleged invention cannot cure its invalidity.”

Procedural preferences

Mahoney enforced territorial limits on service over foreign corporations when the action arose elsewhere and the defendant had not consented to the forum.

“The defendant has not consented1 to the bringing of this action in this district.”

He resolved multi-count pleading attacks count by count, allowing viable alternative negligence theories to proceed while rejecting the deficient count.

“The demurrer to the first count is sustained. It is overruled as to the second, third, fourth, and fifth counts.”

Cautions

Mahoney required claimants to carry their evidentiary burden even after overcoming a threshold limitations defense.

“The burden of proof which rests upon the plaintiff to show that he was totally and permanently disabled while the policy of insurance was in effect has not been established.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Martin v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance Co.
· 1935-11-27
Demurrer (plaintiff) Denied

“The demurrer to the first and second plea is overruled and the pleas sustained.”

Insurance indemnity defense (defendant insurer) Granted
Shambegian v. United States
· 1936-03-13
Motions to dismiss (United States) Denied

“The motion to dismiss is denied.”

Viccioni v. United States
· 1936-03-13
Motions to dismiss (United States) Denied

“The motion to dismiss is denied.”

Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. v. Page
· 1936-04-20
Tax refund claim (plaintiff taxpayer) Granted

“The motion of the plaintiff for judgment is granted.”

Tax refund claim (collector) Denied

“The motion of the defendant for judgment is denied.”

Hughes v. Johnson Educator Food Co.
· 1936-05-22
Demurrer (plaintiff) Denied

“The plaintiff’s demurrer is overruled, and the defendant’s plea to this jurisdiction is sustained.”

Jurisdictional plea (defendant) Granted
Viccioni v. United States
· 1936-07-09
Motion for judgment (United States) Granted

“The motion for judgment for the United States of America is granted.”

Total disability claim (plaintiff veteran) Denied

“The burden of proof which rests upon the plaintiff to show that he was totally and permanently disabled while the policy of insurance was in effect has not been established.”

Martin v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance Co.
· 1936-11-17
Motions to dismiss (defendant insurer) Denied

“The motion to dismiss is denied in each case.”

Motions to strike (plaintiffs) Granted

“The motion to strike out is granted in each case.”

Buck v. Hillsgrove Country Club, Inc.
· 1937-01-11
Motions to strike (copyright holders) Granted

“The motion to strike out paragraphs numbered 38 and 39 of the respondent’s answer is granted.”

Buck v. Del Papa
· 1937-01-11
Motions to strike (copyright holders) Granted

“The motion to strike out paragraphs numbered 38 and 39 of the respondent’s -answer is granted.”

The Everosa
· 1937-02-01
Maritime lien claim (coal supplier) Denied

“The petition for libel is dismissed with costs to the claimant.”

New England Terminal Co. v. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Corp.
· 1937-03-20
Demurrer (defendant) Granted in part

“The demurrer to the first count is sustained. It is overruled as to the second, third, fourth, and fifth counts.”

American Lecithin Co. v. J. C. Ferguson Manufacturing Works, Inc.
· 1937-04-27
Patent invalidity defense (respondent) Denied

“The patent has novelty and utility.”

Patent infringement claim (complainant patentee) Granted

“The conclusion of the court is that the patent is valid and that the record clearly shows that the respondent is guilty of con-tributary infringement, and should be enjoined from further infringements.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No case-level electronic docket record survives in the reviewed archive for Mahoney's district tenure, so no caseload mix, duration, or motion-timing summary is available.

Put Judge Mahoney's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Mahoney actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Mahoney's own signed orders and cites them.