George Moulton Carpenter

U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island district Appointed by Chester A. Arthur (Republican) 25 signed orders read

How Judge Carpenter decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Carpenter treated the failure to stop and listen at a partially obstructed railroad crossing as a failure of due diligence.

“The duty of the plaintiff was to stop, to look, and to listen.”

In a collision dispute, Carpenter placed the burden on the vessel owner asserting that the other vessel changed course.

“On this issue, whether she did so change her course, he has the affirmative and the burden of proof.”

Carpenter confined patent claims to their specific methods when the broader function was already present in the prior art.

“it must be confined to the specific methods used to produce the main result which is the general function of the patented machine”

Procedural preferences

Carpenter required a removal petition based on local prejudice to allege the prejudice itself as a fact, not merely the petitioner's belief.

“in the absence- of a specific averment of the prejudice, there is no evidence» whatever in the papers to bring the case within the act providing for removal.”

He declined to use an earlier patent decree as support for interim relief when validity had not actually been litigated in that proceeding.

“The decree, indeed, was made establishing the patent, but that decree was founded on the constructive admission of the equity of the bill, which is implied in filing the plea.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Dickerson v. Greene
· 1892-11-17
Demurrer (respondents) Denied

“This demurrer must therefore be overruled, and the respondents or: dered to answer over.”

Huntington v. Saunders
· 1896-02-03
Bankruptcy appeal (appellant) Moot / procedural

“it follows that the appeal must be dismissed.”

Holyoke Mach. Co. v. Jolly
· 1896-06-23
Patent infringement claim (complainant) Denied

“Tbe bill will be dismissed.”

Heap v. Greene
· 1896-06-22
Patent infringement claim (complainant) Denied

“The bill will be dismissed with costs.”

Leatheroid Manuf'g Co. v. Cummings
· 1896-06-19
Patent infringement claim (complainant) Denied

“The bill will be dismissed.”

Heap v. Tremont & Suffolk Mills
· 1896-06-22
Patent infringement claim (complainant) Denied

“The bill will lie dismissed with costs.”

Blair Camera Co. v. Robey
· 1893-01-19
Patent infringement claim (complainant) Denied

“The claim is invalid, for want of novdlty, and the bill must be dismissed.”

Higbee v. Ninety-Six Hundred Cases Tomatoes
· 1894-02-03
Motion for payment of fund (libelant) Granted

“There will he an order that the fund he paid to the libelant, after deducting the fee chargeable by the clerk.”

Norfolk & W. R. v. The Berkshire
· 1893-12-26
Exception to statutory defense (libelant) Granted

“The exception will be sustained.”

Utica Fire-Alarm Tel. Co. v. Municipal Fire & Police Tel. Co.
· 1895-06-12
Patent infringement claim (complainant) Denied

“I therefore conclude that the respondents do not infringe, and that the bill must be dismissed.”

Strater v. Keyes
· 1895-07-12
Patent infringement claim (complainant) Denied

“The bill will therefore be dismissed, with costs of the respondents.”

Heney v. The Josie
· 1894-02-09
Maritime libel (libelant) Moot / procedural

“An order will he made that the libel he dismissed, with costs, unless the libelant shall within 10 days discontinue as to one action, or so amend the libel as to strike out one of the claims.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No case-level electronic docket record survives in the reviewed archive for Carpenter's tenure, so no caseload mix, duration, or motion-timing summary is available.

Put Judge Carpenter's record to work

Ezel drafts and answers grounded in this exact profile: how Judge Carpenter actually rules, not a generic AI guess.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer is grounded in Judge Carpenter's own signed orders and cites them.