Ralph Francis Scalera

United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania district Deceased · served 1971–2011 Appointed by Richard Nixon (Republican) 26 signed orders read

Judge Scalera no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

W. D. Rubright Co. v. International Harvester Co.
· 1973-05-10
Motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (International Harvester Company) Denied

“Defendant’s motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial must be denied.”

Motion for new trial (International Harvester Company) Denied
United States v. Graves
· 1975-05-13
Motion for judgment of acquittal (Bennie Graves) Denied

“The defendant is adjudged guilty of Counts One and Two of the indictment.”

Jackson v. University of Pittsburgh
· 1975-12-12
Motions to dismiss (University of Pittsburgh and individual defendants) Granted in part

“Therefore, Count III should be dismissed.”

Latrobe Steel Co. v. United Steelworkers of America
· 1975-12-09
Motion to vacate preliminary injunction (Defendants) Denied

“It is hereby ordered and decreed that defendants’ motion to vacate the entry of the preliminary injunction be and is hereby denied.”

Artman v. International Harvester Company
· 1972-08-08

Scalera reserved decision on summary judgment while giving the plaintiff a limited opportunity to produce evidence supporting amendment.

Artman v. International Harvester Company
· 1973-02-07
Motion for leave to amend (Plaintiff) Denied

“The plaintiff’s request for leave to amend on this issue must therefore be denied.”

Summary judgment (International Harvester Company) Granted

“It is hereby ordered that summary judgment be and is granted in favor of the defendant in keeping with the above opinion.”

Fram v. Yellow Cab Company of Pittsburgh
· 1974-07-26
Summary judgment (Yellow Cab Company of Pittsburgh) Granted

“We conclude that not only should the defendant’s motion for summary judgment be granted because, under Pennsylvania law, the nineteen Armstrong statements are not capable of a defamatory meaning, but that the granting of the motion for summary judgment may rest as well on our conclusion that the First Amendment standard of actual malice is applicable to this case, and that the plaintiff has failed to show a genuine issue of material fact as to that standard.”

United States v. an Article of Drug Consisting of 110 Cartons
· 1972-09-27
Motions to transfer (Dynamic Classics Ltd.) Denied

“This court is without power to remove this case.”

McCully-Smith Associates, Inc. v. Armour and Company
· 1972-09-18
Motion to quash service (Daniel W. Smith) Granted

“Defendant Smith has not been properly served under Rule 2077(a)(2).”

United States v. Wilkinson
· 1975-02-14
Motion for new trial (Defendant) Denied

“The statistics to which defendant refers simply do not show that persons arrested in similar circumstances have escaped prosecution and that the government in this case employed an arbitrary and selective motive in prosecuting the defendant.”

United States v. Goslee
· 1975-02-14

Scalera addressed post-trial evidentiary challenges but the retrieved reporter text omitted the formal disposition order.

Eden Hall Farm v. United States
· 1975-02-14

After a nonjury trial, Scalera resolved a federal tax-exemption dispute.

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No surviving assigned-case index was located for Scalera's tenure. The profile therefore makes no claim about his caseload, case duration, motion base rates, or ruling speed.

A historical record

Judge Scalera no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.