Hubert Irving Teitelbaum

United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania district Deceased · served 1970–1995 Appointed by Richard Nixon (Republican) 26 signed orders read

Judge Teitelbaum no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Bintrim v. Bruce-Merilees Electric Co.
· 1981-08-25
Motions to remand (Plaintiffs) Granted

“The motions to remand will be granted and the instant actions will be remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Lawrence County, Pennsylvania.”

Johnson v. Eli Lilly and Co.
· 1983-09-19
Judgment on the pleadings (Eli Lilly and Company) Granted

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said motion is granted.”

Daniels v. United States Parole Commission
· 1977-04-12
Motion to vacate sentence (Petitioner) Denied

“Accordingly, petitioner’s motion to vacate sentence will be denied by appropriate Order.”

Blair v. Manhattan Life Insurance
· 1981-06-24
Summary judgment (Plaintiff) Denied

“For all of the foregoing reasons, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment will be denied and defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be denied.”

Summary judgment (Defendant Manhattan Life Insurance Company) Denied
Carnevale Ex Rel. Carnevale v. Sentry Insurance
· 1979-05-02

After resolving the merits without a party motion, Teitelbaum entered judgment for the plaintiff because the policy set-off conflicted with Pennsylvania no-fault law.

Pettibon v. Pennzoil Products Co.
· 1986-12-11
Motions to dismiss (Pennzoil Products Company and Pennzoil Company) Denied

“Therefore, defendants’ motion to dismiss the pendent state tort claim will be denied.”

Brown v. Johnston
· 1987-11-24
Summary judgment (Defendants) Denied

“Because there are disputed factual issues, the motion must be denied.”

Gribshaw v. Ohio Barge Lines, Inc.
· 1982-02-23
Summary judgment (Ohio Barge Lines, Inc.) Granted in part

“For the reasons set forth below the motion is granted in part and denied in part.”

Marine Midland Bank v. Surfbelt, Inc.
· 1982-02-16

Teitelbaum continued execution proceedings to permit proof of the amount of retirement funds protected from execution.

Phillips v. TPC Communications, Inc.
· 1982-02-11

After resolving the submitted merits without an identified party motion, Teitelbaum entered judgment for the defendant because the securities reporting rule did not create the asserted private right.

Laurel Coal Co. v. Walter E. Heller & Co., Inc.
· 1982-05-07
Motions to dismiss (Walter E. Heller & Co., Inc.) Denied

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied.”

Palucis v. Schweiker
· 1981-09-15
Motions to dismiss (Secretary of Health and Human Services) Granted

“For all of the foregoing reasons, defendant’s motion to dismiss will be granted.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

No surviving assigned-case index was located for Teitelbaum's tenure. The profile therefore makes no claim about his caseload, case duration, motion base rates, or ruling speed.

A historical record

Judge Teitelbaum no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.