Arthur James Schwab

How Judge Schwab rules, drawn from 41 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Position
District judge
Status
Senior status
Appointed by
George W. Bush (Republican)
Commissioned
September 17, 2002
Education
Grove City College, A.B., 1968; University of Virginia School of Law, J.D., 1972
Signed orders read
41

About Judge Schwab

Arthur J. Schwab is a judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Appointed by President George W. Bush, Judge Schwab received a commission on September 17, 2002. Judge Schwab assumed senior status on January 1, 2018.

Judge Schwab's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Schwab, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Contacting chambers

Submit communications by motion with a proposed order.

“Communication with the Court shall be in the form of motions, accompanied by a proposed order specifying the relief requested.”

Filing

All CM/ECF filings must be searchable.

“All documents filed on CM/ECF must be searchable.”

Motions

Moving and responsive briefs are limited to 15 pages without leave.

“There is a page restriction of fifteen (15) pages for all moving and responsive briefs filed with the Court”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 9, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

Taylor v. Winnecour
· 2011-07-26
Bankruptcy appeal (Carole Taylor) Denied

“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Bankruptcy Court is AFFIRMED.”

Neal v. Astrue
· 2010-10-04
Petition for attorney fees (plaintiff) Granted

“the Court will grant plaintiffs Petition and Amended Petition for attorney’s fees in the total amount of $7,565.00, under the EAJA (doc. nos. 19 and 24), based upon an expenditure of 44.5 hours at the rate of $170.00 per hour.”

N.A. v. Gateway School District
· 2011-05-17
Motions to dismiss (Gateway School District) Granted

“For the reasons discussed above, the Defendant’s motion to dismiss will be GRANTED.”

United States v. Harris
· 2004-07-16

Schwab addressed the effect of Blakely on the federal Sentencing Guidelines while imposing sentence; the writing does not resolve a party motion included in this profile.

Ferrone v. Cardiello
· 2014-09-29
Motion for stay or preliminary injunction (Rock Ferrone) Denied

“it is hereby ORDERED that Fer-rone’s Emergency Motion to Stay Sale Pending Appeal is DENIED.”

Romano v. Williams & Fudge, Inc.
· 2008-12-04
Motion for partial summary judgment (Ruben Romano) Granted

“this Court will grant plaintiffs motion (doc. no. 35) to the extent that defendant violated the FDCPA as a matter of law.”

Summary judgment (Williams & Fudge, Inc.) Denied

“The Court will deny defendant’s motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 39).”

Lippl v. International Fidelity Insurance
· 2014-07-25
Bankruptcy appeal (John R. Lippi) Denied

“the Order by the Bankruptcy Judge on the Motion to Compel Abandonment will be AFFIRMED.”

Shovlin v. Klaas
· 2015-08-28
Bankruptcy appeal (creditor-appellant) Denied

“the Court hereby AFFIRMS the June 4, 2015 Order of the Bankruptcy Court denying the Motion to Dismiss.”

Konold v. Superior International Industries Inc.
· 2012-10-31
Motions to dismiss (Superior International Industries Inc. and Small Water Slides) Granted in part

“Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 6 and 8) will be GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART.”

Motions to dismiss (Aquatic Facility Design Inc.) Granted in part
Countryway Insurance v. Slaugenhoup
· 2008-02-22
Summary judgment (Countryway Insurance Company) Denied

“The motion for summary judgment by plaintiff, Countryway Insurance Company (doc. no. 18) will be DENIED.”

Summary judgment (Dustin C. Sams) Granted

“The motion for summary judgment by defendant, Dustin C. Sams’, (doc. no. 28) will be GRANTED.”

Summary judgment (Walter C. Slaugenhoup and Walter P. Slaugenhoup) Granted

“The motion for summary judgment by defendants, Walter C. Slaugenhoup and Walter P. Slaugenhoup (doc. no. 31) will be GRANTED.”

Young v. 1200 Buena Vista Condominiums
· 2012-08-27
Bankruptcy appeal (Bradley J. Young) Granted

“Thus, the decision of the Bankruptcy Court will be REVERSED. The case will be REMANDED to the Bankruptcy Court for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion.”

Tayfur v. Swepi LP
· 2014-07-07
Bankruptcy appeal (Mustafa Tayfur) Denied

“For the reasons that follow, the decision of the Bankruptcy Court will be affirmed.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The surviving 20-case metadata cohort consists entirely of terminated matters filed from September through December 2002. It is an archival slice rather than a career-wide caseload estimate.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years0
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202600
Sep 202500
Mar 202500
Sep 202400
Mar 202400
Sep 202300
Mar 202300
Sep 202200
Mar 202200
Sep 202100
Mar 202100
Sep 202000

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, not for Judge Schwab: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed1,9656.5 months
Closed with no court action6654.6 months
Closed before pretrial6595.1 months
Closed during or after pretrial6328.4 months
Closed during trial9not reported
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20251,9656.5 months
Sep 20241,8716.3 months
Sep 20232,0215.9 months
Sep 20221,9886.5 months
Sep 20211,8916.3 months
Sep 20201,9395.6 months
Sep 20191,7666.9 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Schwab with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Schwab, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Schwab's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace