Charles B. Witmer

United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania district Deceased · served 1911–1925 Appointed by William Howard Taft (Republican) 20 signed orders read

Judge Witmer no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

How Judge Witmer decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

Witmer required a bankruptcy petitioner to plead facts constituting an act of bankruptcy, rather than repeat the statutory formula.

“It is not sufficient to charge acts of bankruptcy in the language of the statute.”

In preference litigation, he required proof of every statutory element and would not displace the written transfer date on equivocal testimony.

“The plaintiff has failed to furnish the required proof to establish the first reqúisite.”

He treated statutory wage priority narrowly when a single contract combined personal labor with the use of a team and the two components could not be separated.

“There is nothing in the petitioner’s contract to individuate his services and the services of his team.”

Procedural preferences

Witmer independently examined subject-matter jurisdiction even when the parties did not press the issue.

“It is the duty of the court to inquire whether the showing made entitles the plaintiff’s case to consideration here.”

He confined enforcement officers to the warrant procedures supplied by the statute authorizing their work.

“The search warrant appears unfounded and unauthorized, and the motion to quash is therefore allowed.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re York Silk Mfg. Co.
· 1911-07-08
Claim for priority (Commonwealth of Pennsylvania) Denied

“disallowing the claim of the commonwealth, as preferred”

Claim for penalties (Commonwealth of Pennsylvania) Denied

“rejecting the claim for penalties”

In re McUlta
· 1911-06-27
Exceptions to referee order (objecting party) Denied

“The order of the referee is affirmed.”

Spruks v. Lackawanna Dairy Co.
· 1911-07-19
Preferred claim (petitioner) Denied

“The prayer of the petition is refused.”

Dallyn v. Brady
· 1912-07-29
Plea to jurisdiction (defendant) Denied

“The plea t,o the jurisdiction is therefore overruled, and the defendant is directed to answer over.”

American Caramel Co. v. Williams
· 1912-12-30
Request for permanent injunction (American Caramel Company) Granted

“the defendant be enjoined from further infringement of complainant’s patent No. 945,788”

In re Harrison Bros.
· 1912-10-15
Exceptions to referee order (objecting party) Denied

“the findings, conclusions, and order of the referee are affirmed.”

In re Deer Creek Water & Water Power Co.
· 1913-02-15
Demurrer to involuntary bankruptcy petition (Deer Creek Water & Water Power Company) Granted

“The demurrer is sustained, and the petition is dismissed.”

United States v. Czeslicki
· 1913-12-23
Habeas petition (Peter Czeslicki) Denied

“The prisoner is remanded to the custody of the immigration officer, that the warrant of deportation may be executed.”

Wilkes-Barre & W. V. Traction Co. v. Davis
· 1914-06-03
Rule for judgment (Wilkes-Barre & Wyoming Valley Traction Company) Granted

“The taxes were unlawfully imposed, and the rule for judgment is made absolute.”

Hagar v. Watt
· 1915-10-15
Bankruptcy avoidance claim (bankruptcy trustee) Denied

“The bill is dismissed, at the costs of plaintiff.”

Watson v. Pennsylvania R.
· 1916-05-22
Motion to quash (Pennsylvania Railroad) Denied

“motion to quash is denied, but the service of the statement is set aside.”

Request to set aside service (Pennsylvania Railroad) Granted
United States ex rel. Sargent & Co. v. Brown
· 1920-07-09
Motions to stay (American Fidelity Company) Denied

“the rule to show cause is dismissed, and the case ordered on the trial list for trial at the next term of court at Harrisburg, Pa.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

The located writings span bankruptcy, jurisdiction, patent, tax, immigration, employment, condemnation, and search-warrant disputes. They do not establish the distribution of Witmer's full caseload.

A historical record

Judge Witmer no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.