Marjorie Osterlund Rendell

How Judge Rendell rules, drawn from 6 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Judge Rendell no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.

Court
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Position
district
Status
Retired 1997
Served
1994–1997
Appointed by
William J. Clinton (Democratic)
Commissioned
1994-02-11
Education
University of Pennsylvania, B.A., 1969; Villanova University School of Law, J.D., 1973
Signed orders read
6

How Judge Rendell decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In an employment-disability dispute, Rendell focused on the individual claimant’s evidence rather than general assumptions about people with the same impairment.

“Accordingly, I will concern myself with the particular facts of plaintiffs claimed limitation, rather than the characteristics generally attributable to individuals with myopia.”

Procedural preferences

On bankruptcy appeal, Rendell deferred to the bankruptcy judge’s opportunity to observe witnesses when reviewing factual findings.

“giving due deference to the bankruptcy judge’s ability to observe and judge the witnesses before him, I will AFFIRM.”

Cautions

In reviewing plan confirmation, Rendell would not assume that voting claims fit a designated class when the record did not identify their precise character.

“Nothing in the record delineates the precise character of the claims that voted in Class II.”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

In re Independent Pier Co.
· 1997-06-27
Bankruptcy appeal (law-firm appellant) Denied

“Accordingly, the order of the bankruptcy judge sustaining the objections to Dechert’s secured proof of claim is AFFIRMED.”

Wilson v. Pennsylvania State Police Department
· 1997-03-26
Summary judgment (defendants) Denied

“Therefore, I conclude that defendants have not established their entitlement to summary judgment on the facts as presented here.”

In Re Duval Manor Associates
· 1996-11-26
Bankruptcy appeal (debtor-appellant) Granted

“I will reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

In Re Murray
· 1996-10-04
Bankruptcy appeal (debtor-appellant) Denied

“Accordingly, the judgment of the bankruptcy court is AFFIRMED.”

Certainteed Corp. v. Federal Insurance
· 1995-11-17
Motion for partial summary judgment (CertainTeed) Denied

“Certain-Teed’s Motion is DENIED.”

Summary judgment (Federal Insurance Co.) Granted in part

“Federal’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts' I — III with regard to its duty to defend and indemnify CertainTeed is GRANTED; its Motion on Count IV with regard to plaintiffs’ allegations of bad faith is DENIED.”

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Farmer
· 1994-09-16
Summary judgment (individual director and attorney defendants) Denied

“For the foregoing reasons, I shall deny the IDA Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

A fixed cohort of the first 15 cases filed after commission was reviewed; all had terminated, with a median filed-to-termination duration of 301 days. The docket archive contained no entry text for motion outcomes or timing.

A historical record

Judge Rendell no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.