Juan R. Sanchez

“the Motion (Document 14) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: The Motion is GRANTED insofar as Aspira's substantive due process claim in Count II is DISMISSED with prejudice; and The balance of the Motion is DENIED.”

“Defendants' motions to dismiss (Documents 14 & 15) are GRANTED. Smith-Goodman's Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED.”

“Smith-Goodman's motion seeking a preliminary injunction (Document 18) is DISMISSED as moot.”

“upon consideration of Defendant Secretary of the Navy's ('the Navy') Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 11) and Plaintiff Sang Heng's response thereto -- and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum -- it is ORDERED the Motion is DENIED.”

“Defendants' motions to dismiss are granted insofar as the case will be transferred to the Middle District of Florida. ... In lieu of staying or dismissing this case, however, the case will be transferred to the Middle District of Florida, where an earlier related action is pending.”

“Defendants' motions to dismiss for lack of standing are denied.”

“Defendants' motions to strike Plaintiff's proposed class definition are also denied.”

“The City's Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 51) is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of the City as to Counts I and II of Addeo's Amended Complaint.”

“The Union's Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 53) is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of the Union as to Count II of Addeo's Amended Complaint.”

“Addeo's Petition to Rescind Jury Waiver Pursuant to Rule 39(b) (Document 87) is DISMISSED as MOOT. The Clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED.”

“Defendant Oldham Global, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint is DENIED.”

“Because the Court agrees with Defendants that a certificate of merit is required in this case, Flint's motion to strike will be denied.”

“it is ORDERED the Motion (Dkt. No. 20) is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Lt. Pittaoulis as to all claims in Abdulla's Complaint.”

“upon consideration of Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 71, 72) ... and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED the Motions are DENIED.”

“ORDERED the Motions are DENIED. (Second of two defendant-group MSJs, ECF No. 72, likewise denied.)”

“Defendants Millersville University of Pennsylvania (Millersville), Louis P. DeSol, and Roger Bruszewski's Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 9) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: Summary judgment is DENIED as to Dickinson's Title VII claim against Millersville. Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to all claims asserted against DeSol and Bruszewski individually.”

“The Court will grant summary judgment in favor of the moving Defendants on all claims. Green has failed to demonstrate any genuine dispute of material fact and Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on all claims.”

“For the same reasons, the Court will also deny Green's motion for summary judgment.”

“Defendant Bristol Township's Motion to Dismiss (Document 4) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs Rakeem Rankins and Pearline Davis's Complaint (Document 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiffs shall have until June 14, 2017, to file an amended complaint.”