John F. Murphy

How Judge Murphy rules, drawn from 26 signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Position
District judge
Appointed by
Joseph R. Biden Jr.
Commissioned
December 23, 2022
Education
Cornell University (B.S., 1999); California Institute of Technology (M.S., 2002; Ph.D., 2005); Harvard Law School (J.D., 2007)
Signed orders read
26

About Judge Murphy

John F. Murphy is a judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. President Joseph R. Biden Jr. appointed him, and he received his commission on December 23, 2022.

Judge Murphy's practices and standing orders

Rules for cases before Judge Murphy, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026). Judges revise these often, so confirm the current version on the court's site before you file.

Key rules

Filing

Make requests for relief through an electronic filing, usually a motion; use email only when directed or for a scheduling emergency.

“All requests and written communication with chambers should be made through an appropriate ECF filing. Requests for relief should almost always be made by motion. E-mail”

Filing

Make all electronic filings, including exhibits, text searchable.

“All ECF filings must be text-searchable, including exhibits.”

Filing

Attach copies of any web pages relied on as exhibits.

“You must attach as exhibits copies of any web pages relied upon.”

Standing orders for every case in this court

Orders the court applies to all of its cases, whichever judge has them, as published on the court's website (checked October 8, 2026).

Key rules from these orders · The court's local rules ↗

How Judge Murphy decides

Patterns drawn from this judge's own signed orders. Every observation links to the order it came from.

What persuades

In one employment case, the court certified a class after addressing the Rule 23 requirements.

“plaintiffs motion for class certification (DI 27) is GRANTED”

Procedural preferences

In one dismissal order, the court allowed an amended complaint after dismissing the initial pleading without prejudice.

“We grant plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint no later than May 12, 2026”

Cautions

The court denied four separate new trial motions in one criminal case.

“Defendant Mikal McCracken’s motion for a new trial (DI 577) is DENIED”

Signed rulings

A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.

United States v. Verne
2:24-cr-00270 · 2026-09-04
Motion to vacate sentence (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence (DI 64) is DENIED”

Motion for collateral relief (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion for collateral relief (DI 65) is DENIED”

Motion for appointment of counsel (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion for appointment of new counsel (DI 68) is DENIED”

United States v. McCracken
2:24-cr-00003 · 2026-09-01
Motion for new trial (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Mikal McCracken’s motion for a new trial (DI 577) is DENIED”

Motion for new trial (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Amin Muse’s motion for a new trial (DI 578) is DENIED”

Motion for judgment of acquittal (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Kavon Coleman’s motion for judgment of acquittal (DI 579) is DENIED”

Motion for new trial (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Dean Fosque’s motion for a new trial (DI 580) is DENIED”

Motion for new trial (defendant) Denied

“Defendant Aleem Abdul-Hakim’s motion for a new trial (DI 631) is DENIED”

Fredericks v. Assurant Specialty
2:26-cv-01378 · 2026-08-12
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendants’ motion to dismiss (DI 20) is GRANTED in that Assurant Specialty is dismissed as a party, but otherwise DENIED”

Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted in part

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss (DI 21) is GRANTED in that the bad faith claim against Rocket Mortgage is dismissed, but otherwise DENIED”

Sol3, LLC v. Inversal Inc.
2:25-cv-00255 · 2026-08-12
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted in part

“defendants’ motion for summary judgment (DI 30) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part”

Hart v. Parkinson
2:22-cv-02425 · 2026-07-29
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Granted

“defendant’s motion to dismiss (DI 31) is GRANTED”

Puleo v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corporation
2:25-cv-02151 · 2026-07-20
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“defendant’s motion for summary judgment (DI 26) is GRANTED”

DeLong v. PHE, Inc.
2:24-cv-05212 · 2026-07-16
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendant’s motion to dismiss (DI 23) is DENIED”

Cruz v. Superintendent SCI Albion
2:25-cv-02296 · 2026-06-26
Motions to stay (petitioner) Moot / procedural

“The Motion to Stay (DI 16) is DENIED as moot”

Petition for habeas corpus (petitioner) Moot / procedural

“The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DI 1) is DISMISSED”

Freeman v. Thompson
2:23-cv-03578 · 2026-06-24
Petition for habeas corpus (petitioner) Denied

“The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (DI 24) is DENIED with prejudice”

Motion for extension of time (respondent) Moot / procedural

“Respondents’ motion for an extension (DI 42) is DENIED as moot”

Amodu v. Oxford Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center
2:25-cv-00583 · 2026-06-05
Summary judgment (defendant) Granted

“defendant’s motion for summary judgment (DI 24) is GRANTED”

Dawson v. Graham
2:25-cv-05438 · 2026-06-03
Motions to dismiss (defendant) Denied

“Defendants’ motion to dismiss (DI 20) is DENIED”

Secretary of Housing and Urban Development v. Robinson
2:26-cv-00418 · 2026-06-01
Motion to dismiss counterclaim and for judgment on pleadings (plaintiff) Denied

“plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim and motion for judgment on the pleadings (DI 9) is DENIED”

Caseload & timing

From public federal docket records for this judge.

Median motion-to-ruling time: 147.5 days (N = 8).

The selected cases include civil rights, employment, insurance, personal injury, and recent pending matters. One long class action supplied most usable motion text, so the selection is not representative of the judge’s caseload.

Pending matters in the official report

Reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts under the Civil Justice Reform Act, as of March 31, 2026.

Motions pending more than six months0
Bench trials submitted more than six months0
Bankruptcy appeals pending more than six months0
Social Security appeals pending more than six months0
Civil cases pending more than three years9
ReportMotions over six monthsCases over three years
Mar 202609
Sep 202508
Mar 202504
Sep 202400
Mar 202430
Sep 202350
Mar 202300

A snapshot on that date: matters listed may since have been decided or reassigned. A motion referred to a magistrate judge is counted for both judges. Motions in multidistrict litigation, section 2255 cases and Social Security appeals are not counted, and a very large three-year count is generally a multidistrict docket. Source: Appendix A of the report (PDF); about the report.

How long civil cases take in this court

For the whole of U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, not for Judge Murphy: median time from filing to disposition of the civil cases the court closed in the 12 months ending September 30, 2025, as reported by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

CasesMedian time
All civil cases closed5,7305.1 months
Closed with no court action1,9523.2 months
Closed before pretrial2,8344.7 months
Closed during or after pretrial89810 months
Closed during trial4617.8 months
12 months endingCases closedMedian time
Sep 20255,7305.1 months
Sep 20246,2004.6 months
Sep 20236,5957 months
Sep 20225,2216.6 months
Sep 20215,2456.5 months
Sep 20204,6865.7 months
Sep 20195,3746 months

The table leaves out prisoner petitions, land condemnations, deportation reviews, recovery of overpayments and enforcement of judgments, and reports no median for fewer than 10 cases. A district that closed a large multidistrict litigation in the period shows very large counts and long medians for that year. Source: Table C-5, U.S. District Courts (spreadsheet).

Draft for Judge Murphy with the record in hand

Ezel grounds your drafting and research in this profile: what has persuaded Judge Murphy, and what has not, cited to the signed orders.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Grounded in Judge Murphy's own signed orders
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace