Jay Carl Waldman
Judge Waldman no longer hears cases. This profile is preserved as a historical record of how they ruled.
Signed rulings
A grounded sample of orders signed by this judge, with the verbatim dispositive language.
“For the reasons stated above, defendants’ motion for change of venue will be granted, and this case will be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.”
“Accordingly, defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be granted.”
“For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff’s complaint will be dismissed as to the nongovernmental defendants.”
“Thus, plaintiff is entitled to amend her complaint to name the United States and to relate that amendment back to the time of her initial filing.”
“Plaintiff's motion for judgment by default against these defendants will be denied.”
“Accordingly, defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be granted.”
“For the reasons stated herein, summary judgment will be granted, and limited sanctions will be imposed.”
“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and that the complaint is DISMISSED as to defendant Glassboro State College only.”
“Plaintiff’s request that the court transfer this action to a state court in Pennsylvania or New Jersey is DENIED.”
“Accordingly, plaintiff’s motions will be granted.”
“Rather than grant defendants’ motion to dismiss, however, the court in the interest of justice will grant plaintiff’s alternative request to transfer this case to the Southern District of New York.”
“IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said Motion is GRANTED and the cause of action set forth against this defendant in Count I of plaintiffs’ complaint is DISMISSED.”
“Accordingly, Counts III and V will be dismissed and Count IV will be dismissed without prejudice to replead with the requisite specificity a cause of action for fraud if such can be done.”
“Accordingly, defendant’s motion will be granted.”
“There are no material facts in dispute and MSI is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
“Plaintiff has alleged two claims, both of which are subject to arbitration under the PAA. Retaining jurisdiction would serve no purpose as both claims will be determined in the arbitration.”
“Accordingly, the court will deny the motions to dismiss Count II of plaintiff’s complaint.”
Caseload & timing
From public federal docket records for this judge.
Assigned cases were located across the judge's tenure, but the eight sampled records contained no electronic entries. This bounded holding does not support claims about his career caseload, case duration, motion base rates, or ruling speed.
A historical record
Judge Waldman no longer hears cases. This profile stays available as a record of how they ruled. If you're preparing for a matter, start from the court's current bench.